PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPF2.DE vs. SPYL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPF2.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPF2.DE) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPF2.DE is traded in USD, while SPYL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SPYL.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPF2.DE achieves a 18.08% return, which is significantly higher than SPYL.DE's 10.09% return.


SPF2.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
4.31%
YTD
18.08%
6M
20.36%
1Y
36.83%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
10Y*

SPYL.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.47%
YTD
10.09%
6M
11.10%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPF2.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPF2.DE
SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
18.08%23.43%10.05%8.57%
SPYL.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)
10.09%18.21%24.76%14.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SPF2.DE and SPYL.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.68

The correlation between SPF2.DE and SPYL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPF2.DE vs. SPYL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPF2.DE
SPF2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SPF2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPF2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPF2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SPF2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPF2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYL.DE
SPYL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPF2.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPF2.DE) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPF2.DESPYL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.42

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.74

3.21

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.70

13.72

+10.99

SPF2.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPF2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPF2.DE and SPYL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPF2.DESPYL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29

2.40

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

1.90

-0.79

Drawdowns

SPF2.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPF2.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum SPYL.DE drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPF2.DE and SPYL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPF2.DESPYL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-19.42%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-8.60%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.62%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-1.79%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

2.02%

-0.53%

Volatility

SPF2.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPF2.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) at 2.85%. This indicates that SPF2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPF2.DESPYL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

2.85%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

8.13%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

11.54%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.13%

14.20%

-4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.13%

14.20%

-4.07%

SPF2.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPF2.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.DE's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPF2.DE vs. SPYL.DE - Dividend Comparison

SPF2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while SPYL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
SPF2.DE
SPDR FTSE Global Convertible Bond USD Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.53%0.60%0.43%0.25%
SPYL.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPF2.DE and SPYL.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPF2.DE.

SPF2.DE is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while SPYL.DE is S&P 500. SPF2.DE tracks FTSE Qualified Global Convertible Index, while SPYL.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPF2.DE and 0.03% for SPYL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPF2.DE and SPYL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer