PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEX.L vs. SPMV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEX.L vs. SPMV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPEX.L is traded in GBp, while SPMV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEX.L achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than SPMV.L's 4.40% return.


SPEX.L

1D
0.68%
1M
0.76%
6M
7.46%
YTD
11.86%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

SPMV.L

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.18%
6M
3.42%
YTD
4.40%
1Y
11.16%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEX.L vs. SPMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPEX.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
11.86%3.90%14.09%7.64%-1.17%8,302.22%
SPMV.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.40%3.60%20.76%4.44%-0.48%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEX.L and SPMV.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.76

The correlation between SPEX.L and SPMV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEX.L vs. SPMV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEX.L
SPEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SPEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV.L
SPMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEX.L vs. SPMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEX.LSPMV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.21

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.15

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

6.35

+4.86

SPEX.L vs. SPMV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEX.L and SPMV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEX.L vs. SPMV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEX.L drawdown since its inception was -20.03%, smaller than the maximum SPMV.L drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEX.L and SPMV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEX.LSPMV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.03%

-25.15%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.73%

-5.16%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.03%

-14.55%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.03%

-14.55%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-1.52%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-3.39%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.75%

+0.03%

Volatility

SPEX.L vs. SPMV.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEX.LSPMV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.82%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

7.29%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

9.62%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

12.68%

+6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,820.40%

14.18%

+2,806.22%

SPEX.L vs. SPMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPEX.L and SPMV.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEX.L vs. SPMV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPEX.L nor SPMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEX.L and SPMV.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPEX.L and SPMV.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SPEX.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SPMV.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEX.L and SPMV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer