PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEX.L achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than SPEP.L's 10.66% return.


SPEX.L

1D
0.27%
1M
4.62%
YTD
13.01%
6M
13.48%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*

SPEP.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.51%
YTD
10.66%
6M
11.05%
1Y
30.32%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPEX.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
13.01%3.90%14.09%7.64%-1.17%8,302.22%
SPEP.L
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc
10.66%9.94%26.61%21.47%-8.35%26.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEX.L and SPEP.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.80

The correlation between SPEX.L and SPEP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEX.L
SPEP.L

Technology

20.9%
38.0%

Industrials

14.2%
8.2%

Financial Services

13.9%
12.3%

Healthcare

11.1%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
5.1%

Real Estate

6.1%
2.2%

Utilities

5.7%
1.4%

Energy

4.0%
2.7%

Basic Materials

3.9%
2.0%

Communication Services

3.9%
12.6%

Technology

SPEX.L
20.9%
SPEP.L
38.0%

Industrials

SPEX.L
14.2%
SPEP.L
8.2%

Financial Services

SPEX.L
13.9%
SPEP.L
12.3%

Healthcare

SPEX.L
11.1%
SPEP.L
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEX.L
10.1%
SPEP.L
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPEX.L
6.4%
SPEP.L
5.1%

Real Estate

SPEX.L
6.1%
SPEP.L
2.2%

Utilities

SPEX.L
5.7%
SPEP.L
1.4%

Energy

SPEX.L
4.0%
SPEP.L
2.7%

Basic Materials

SPEX.L
3.9%
SPEP.L
2.0%

Communication Services

SPEX.L
3.9%
SPEP.L
12.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEX.L
SPEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEP.L
SPEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEX.LSPEP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

4.35

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

16.79

-3.03

SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEX.L and SPEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEX.L drawdown since its inception was -20.03%, roughly equal to the maximum SPEP.L drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEX.L and SPEP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEX.LSPEP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.03%

-21.07%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.73%

-6.93%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.03%

-21.07%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.03%

-21.07%

+1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.95%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-4.48%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.80%

-0.04%

Volatility

SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) is 2.24%, while Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that SPEX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEX.LSPEP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

3.56%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.76%

7.60%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

10.91%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

20.10%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,836.41%

20.79%

+2,815.62%

SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEX.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEX.L vs. SPEP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPEX.L nor SPEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEX.L and SPEP.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPEP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPEP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPEX.L.

SPEX.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while SPEP.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPEX.L and 0.09% for SPEP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEX.L and SPEP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer