PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEX.L vs. G500.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEX.L vs. G500.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (G500.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEX.L achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than G500.L's 10.00% return.


SPEX.L

1D
0.68%
1M
0.76%
6M
7.46%
YTD
11.86%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

G500.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.35%
6M
8.64%
YTD
10.00%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEX.L vs. G500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPEX.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
11.86%3.90%14.09%7.64%-1.17%8,302.22%
G500.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
10.00%17.45%24.98%24.88%-19.98%19.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEX.L and G500.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.67

The correlation between SPEX.L and G500.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEX.L vs. G500.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEX.L
SPEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SPEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

G500.L
G500.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
G500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
G500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
G500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
G500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEX.L vs. G500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (G500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEX.LG500.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.66

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

10.74

+0.47

SPEX.L vs. G500.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the G500.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEX.L and G500.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEX.L vs. G500.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEX.L drawdown since its inception was -20.03%, smaller than the maximum G500.L drawdown of -25.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEX.L and G500.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEX.LG500.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.03%

-25.20%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.73%

-8.21%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.03%

-18.22%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.03%

-25.20%

+5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-0.57%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-5.31%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.04%

-0.26%

Volatility

SPEX.L vs. G500.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (G500.L) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEX.LG500.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.79%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

9.28%

-2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

12.06%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

15.99%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,820.40%

15.87%

+2,804.53%

SPEX.L vs. G500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEX.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than G500.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEX.L vs. G500.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPEX.L nor G500.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEX.L and G500.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, G500.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

G500.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPEX.L.

SPEX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while G500.L is US Equities. SPEX.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while G500.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Daily Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPEX.L and 0.05% for G500.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEX.L and G500.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer