PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEQ.L vs. SPMV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEQ.L vs. SPMV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEQ.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEQ.L achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly higher than SPMV.L's 4.44% return.


SPEQ.L

1D
0.66%
1M
1.28%
6M
8.14%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
20.54%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

SPMV.L

1D
0.37%
1M
0.18%
6M
4.16%
YTD
4.44%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEQ.L vs. SPMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPEQ.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
12.08%11.52%12.24%13.97%-11.69%13.21%
SPMV.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.44%11.55%18.68%9.94%-11.05%19.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEQ.L and SPMV.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.83

The correlation between SPEQ.L and SPMV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEQ.L vs. SPMV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEQ.L
SPEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV.L
SPMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEQ.L vs. SPMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEQ.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPEQ.LSPMV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

1.86

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.75

7.33

+3.42

SPEQ.L vs. SPMV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEQ.L and SPMV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPEQ.L vs. SPMV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum SPMV.L drawdown of -33.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEQ.L and SPMV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEQ.LSPMV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.86%

-33.34%

+12.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-6.23%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.67%

-12.31%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.86%

-18.58%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.56%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-3.13%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.59%

+0.32%

Volatility

SPEQ.L vs. SPMV.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEQ.L) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) at 2.36%. This indicates that SPEQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEQ.LSPMV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.36%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

6.39%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

8.51%

+2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

12.68%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

13.77%

+2.90%

SPEQ.L vs. SPMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPEQ.L and SPMV.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEQ.L vs. SPMV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPEQ.L nor SPMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEQ.L and SPMV.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPEQ.L and SPMV.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SPEQ.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return, while SPMV.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEQ.L and SPMV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer