SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L
SPEP.L (Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc) and XSXG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D) are both S&P 500 funds - SPEP.L tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index while XSXG.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPEP.L returned 18.82%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for XSXG.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPEP.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for XSXG.L.
Performance
SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPEP.L is traded in GBp, while XSXG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XSXG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEP.L achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than XSXG.L's 10.62% return.
SPEP.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 31.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
XSXG.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 29.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEP.L Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc | 9.52% | 9.94% | 26.61% | 21.47% | 2.51% |
XSXG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D | 10.62% | 9.55% | 27.53% | 20.03% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEP.L and XSXG.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SPEP.L and XSXG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPEP.L
XSXG.L
SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPEP.L | XSXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.52 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 4.01 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | 14.46 | -12.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPEP.L | XSXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 2.77 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.27 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than XSXG.L's maximum drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEP.L and XSXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEP.L | XSXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -21.10% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -7.27% | -20.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.82% | -21.10% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.33% | -0.22% | -16.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -3.44% | -4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.90% | 2.02% | +15.88% |
Volatility
SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L) at 2.61%. This indicates that SPEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEP.L | XSXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 2.61% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 7.18% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.33% | 10.58% | +32.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.49% | 13.91% | +17.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.10% | 13.91% | +16.19% |
SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XSXG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Dividend Comparison
SPEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEP.L Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSXG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.11% | 1.30% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SPEP.L and XSXG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XSXG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSXG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPEP.L.
SPEP.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while XSXG.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPEP.L and 0.07% for XSXG.L.
Find the right allocation for SPEP.L and XSXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer