PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPEP.L is traded in GBp, while XSXG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XSXG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEP.L achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than XSXG.L's 10.62% return.


SPEP.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
5.57%
YTD
9.52%
6M
9.85%
1Y
31.49%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
15.68%
10Y*

XSXG.L

1D
-0.22%
1M
6.01%
YTD
10.62%
6M
10.62%
1Y
29.30%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SPEP.L
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc
9.52%9.94%26.61%21.47%2.51%
XSXG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
10.62%9.55%27.53%20.03%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEP.L and XSXG.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022

0.97

The correlation between SPEP.L and XSXG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEP.L
SPEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XSXG.L
XSXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XSXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XSXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPEP.LXSXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.52

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

4.01

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

14.46

-12.71

SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the XSXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEP.L and XSXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPEP.LXSXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

2.77

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.27

-0.67

Drawdowns

SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than XSXG.L's maximum drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEP.L and XSXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEP.LXSXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-21.10%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.82%

-7.27%

-20.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.82%

-21.10%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.33%

-0.22%

-16.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-3.44%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.90%

2.02%

+15.88%

Volatility

SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XSXG.L) at 2.61%. This indicates that SPEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEP.LXSXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.61%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.07%

7.18%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.33%

10.58%

+32.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.49%

13.91%

+17.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.10%

13.91%

+16.19%

SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XSXG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEP.L vs. XSXG.L - Dividend Comparison

SPEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SPEP.L
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSXG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1D
0.82%0.92%1.11%1.30%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SPEP.L and XSXG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XSXG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSXG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPEP.L.

SPEP.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while XSXG.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPEP.L and 0.07% for XSXG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEP.L and XSXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer