PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEP.L vs. UC13.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEP.L vs. UC13.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) and UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPEP.L having a 9.52% return and UC13.L slightly higher at 9.94%.


SPEP.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
5.57%
YTD
9.52%
6M
9.85%
1Y
31.49%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
15.68%
10Y*

UC13.L

1D
-0.22%
1M
6.01%
YTD
9.94%
6M
9.94%
1Y
27.86%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEP.L vs. UC13.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPEP.L
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc
9.52%9.94%26.61%21.47%-8.87%34.78%21.63%
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis
9.94%8.39%25.77%18.14%-10.01%29.47%27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEP.L and UC13.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2020

0.96

The correlation between SPEP.L and UC13.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPEP.L vs. UC13.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEP.L
UC13.L

Technology

38.6%
37.9%

Communication Services

14.5%
10.9%

Financial Services

12.0%
11.3%

Healthcare

9.3%
8.3%

Industrials

6.8%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
9.8%

Energy

4.2%
3.4%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.7%

Utilities

0.8%
2.2%

Technology

SPEP.L
38.6%
UC13.L
37.9%

Communication Services

SPEP.L
14.5%
UC13.L
10.9%

Financial Services

SPEP.L
12.0%
UC13.L
11.3%

Healthcare

SPEP.L
9.3%
UC13.L
8.3%

Industrials

SPEP.L
6.8%
UC13.L
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPEP.L
5.1%
UC13.L
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEP.L
4.6%
UC13.L
9.8%

Energy

SPEP.L
4.2%
UC13.L
3.4%

Real Estate

SPEP.L
2.2%
UC13.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

SPEP.L
1.9%
UC13.L
1.7%

Utilities

SPEP.L
0.8%
UC13.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEP.L vs. UC13.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEP.L
SPEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

UC13.L
UC13.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UC13.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC13.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC13.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
UC13.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC13.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEP.L vs. UC13.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) and UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPEP.LUC13.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.50

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

3.55

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

12.59

-10.83

SPEP.L vs. UC13.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the UC13.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEP.L and UC13.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPEP.LUC13.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

2.65

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.94

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.89

-0.29

Drawdowns

SPEP.L vs. UC13.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than UC13.L's maximum drawdown of -25.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEP.L and UC13.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEP.LUC13.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-25.59%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.82%

-7.82%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.82%

-21.52%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.82%

-21.52%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.33%

-0.22%

-16.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-3.55%

-3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.90%

2.21%

+15.69%

Volatility

SPEP.L vs. UC13.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that SPEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC13.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEP.LUC13.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.62%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.07%

7.11%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.33%

10.54%

+32.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.49%

14.45%

+17.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.10%

15.72%

+14.38%

SPEP.L vs. UC13.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than UC13.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEP.L vs. UC13.L - Dividend Comparison

SPEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC13.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPEP.L
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis
0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SPEP.L and UC13.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UC13.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC13.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPEP.L.

SPEP.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while UC13.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPEP.L and 0.03% for UC13.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEP.L and UC13.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer