PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPEP.L achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than SPEX.L's 9.62% return.


SPEP.L

1D
0.69%
1M
5.80%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.71%
1Y
32.26%
3Y*
18.76%
5Y*
15.83%
10Y*

SPEX.L

1D
0.47%
1M
4.77%
YTD
9.62%
6M
10.01%
1Y
21.02%
3Y*
12.25%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPEP.L
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc
10.28%9.94%26.61%21.47%-8.87%23.05%
SPEX.L
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
9.62%3.90%14.09%7.64%-1.17%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPEP.L and SPEX.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021

0.79

The correlation between SPEP.L and SPEX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPEP.L
SPEX.L

Technology

38.6%
20.1%

Communication Services

14.5%
3.9%

Financial Services

12.0%
14.2%

Healthcare

9.3%
11.2%

Industrials

6.8%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
9.9%

Energy

4.2%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.9%

Utilities

0.8%
5.8%

Technology

SPEP.L
38.6%
SPEX.L
20.1%

Communication Services

SPEP.L
14.5%
SPEX.L
3.9%

Financial Services

SPEP.L
12.0%
SPEX.L
14.2%

Healthcare

SPEP.L
9.3%
SPEX.L
11.2%

Industrials

SPEP.L
6.8%
SPEX.L
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPEP.L
5.1%
SPEX.L
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPEP.L
4.6%
SPEX.L
9.9%

Energy

SPEP.L
4.2%
SPEX.L
4.2%

Real Estate

SPEP.L
2.2%
SPEX.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

SPEP.L
1.9%
SPEX.L
3.9%

Utilities

SPEP.L
0.8%
SPEX.L
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPEP.L
SPEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEX.L
SPEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPEP.LSPEX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.39

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

3.65

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.79

11.85

-10.05

SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the SPEX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPEP.L and SPEX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPEP.LSPEX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

2.18

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.67

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.80

-0.20

Drawdowns

SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPEP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than SPEX.L's maximum drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEP.L and SPEX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPEP.LSPEX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-19.65%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.82%

-5.73%

-22.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.82%

-19.65%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.82%

-19.65%

-8.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.76%

0.00%

-15.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-4.12%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.93%

1.77%

+16.16%

Volatility

SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEX.L) at 1.97%. This indicates that SPEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPEP.LSPEX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

1.97%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

6.62%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.32%

9.62%

+33.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.49%

14.05%

+17.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.09%

14.60%

+15.49%

SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPEP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPEX.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPEP.L vs. SPEX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPEP.L nor SPEX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SPEP.L and SPEX.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPEP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPEP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPEX.L.

SPEP.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while SPEX.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPEP.L and 0.20% for SPEX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPEP.L and SPEX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer