SPEP.L vs. IUUS.L
SPEP.L (Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc) and IUUS.L (iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds - SPEP.L tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index while IUUS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPEP.L returned 15.68%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for IUUS.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPEP.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUUS.L.
Performance
SPEP.L vs. IUUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPEP.L is traded in GBp, while IUUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEP.L achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than IUUS.L's 3.98% return.
SPEP.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 31.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.82%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
IUUS.L
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 11.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SPEP.L vs. IUUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEP.L Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc | 9.52% | 9.94% | 26.61% | 21.47% | -8.87% | 34.78% | 21.63% |
IUUS.L iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.98% | 7.55% | 25.06% | -12.65% | 14.20% | 19.51% | -3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEP.L and IUUS.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2020 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPEP.L and IUUS.L has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPEP.L vs. IUUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Technology
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
-
Communication Services
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
-
Financial Services
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
-
Healthcare
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
-
Industrials
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
-
Energy
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
-
Real Estate
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
-
Basic Materials
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
-
Utilities
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEP.L vs. IUUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPEP.L
IUUS.L
SPEP.L vs. IUUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPEP.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.13 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | 2.56 | -0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPEP.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.74 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.59 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.42 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
SPEP.L vs. IUUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum IUUS.L drawdown of -29.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEP.L and IUUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEP.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -29.76% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -9.52% | -18.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.82% | -13.84% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.82% | -29.76% | +1.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.33% | -6.90% | -9.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -8.79% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.90% | 4.37% | +13.53% |
Volatility
SPEP.L vs. IUUS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) is 2.81%, while iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUUS.L) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that SPEP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEP.L | IUUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 5.33% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 12.58% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.33% | 15.12% | +28.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.49% | 17.19% | +14.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.10% | 18.71% | +11.39% |
SPEP.L vs. IUUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IUUS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPEP.L vs. IUUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPEP.L nor IUUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPEP.L and IUUS.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPEP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPEP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUUS.L.
SPEP.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while IUUS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPEP.L and 0.15% for IUUS.L.
Find the right allocation for SPEP.L and IUUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer