SPDM.L vs. CMOP.L
SPDM.L (iShares Physical Palladium ETC) and CMOP.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc) are both Commodities funds - SPDM.L tracks the London Palladium PM Fix while CMOP.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPDM.L returned -12.62%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for CMOP.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPDM.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for CMOP.L.
Performance
SPDM.L vs. CMOP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDM.L achieves a -13.23% return, which is significantly lower than CMOP.L's 26.50% return.
SPDM.L
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- -13.23%
- 6M
- -7.76%
- 1Y
- 36.78%
- 3Y*
- -3.85%
- 5Y*
- -12.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
CMOP.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 26.50%
- 6M
- 24.83%
- 1Y
- 40.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- —
SPDM.L vs. CMOP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDM.L iShares Physical Palladium ETC | -13.23% | 62.20% | -17.63% | -41.15% | 5.58% | -19.60% | 19.23% | 47.36% | 25.02% | 23.65% |
CMOP.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc | 26.50% | 8.23% | 6.01% | -12.72% | 28.44% | 28.71% | -7.11% | 3.31% | -5.01% | -5.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDM.L and CMOP.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2017 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDM.L vs. CMOP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPDM.L
CMOP.L
SPDM.L vs. CMOP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Palladium ETC (SPDM.L) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPDM.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 5.24 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.37 | 12.05 | -9.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPDM.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.18 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | 0.75 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.44 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
SPDM.L vs. CMOP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDM.L drawdown since its inception was -70.87%, which is greater than CMOP.L's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDM.L and CMOP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDM.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.87% | -28.78% | -42.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.67% | -7.63% | -28.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.59% | -14.89% | -25.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.87% | -28.78% | -42.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.18% | -3.71% | -52.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -12.18% | -12.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.54% | 3.32% | +13.22% |
Volatility
SPDM.L vs. CMOP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Palladium ETC (SPDM.L) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L) at 6.20%. This indicates that SPDM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMOP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDM.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 6.20% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.16% | 16.11% | +21.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.70% | 18.36% | +26.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.85% | 16.58% | +25.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.57% | 15.14% | +22.43% |
SPDM.L vs. CMOP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDM.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CMOP.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPDM.L vs. CMOP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPDM.L nor CMOP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDM.L and CMOP.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMOP.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMOP.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPDM.L.
SPDM.L tracks London Palladium PM Fix, while CMOP.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPDM.L and 0.19% for CMOP.L.
Find the right allocation for SPDM.L and CMOP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer