SPCI vs. OMAH

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SPCI (Tuttle Capital Space Industry Income Blast ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. SPCI is passively managed, while OMAH is actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

SPCI vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tuttle Capital Space Industry Income Blast ETF (SPCI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SPCI

• 1D: -5.52%
• 1M: -29.94%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 2.78%
• 6M: 7.83%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 1Y: 12.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPCI vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SPCI Tuttle Capital Space Industry Income Blast ETF	11.29%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SPCI and OMAH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026	0.12

Return for Risk

SPCI vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPCI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 62
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 50
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPCI vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Space Industry Income Blast ETF (SPCI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPCI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.48	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.09	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.49	—

Drawdowns

SPCI vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPCI drawdown since its inception was -48.69%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPCI and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPCI	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.69%	-11.83%	-36.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.69%	-0.42%	-48.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.92%	-1.25%	-13.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPCI	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.73%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.01%	8.20%	+89.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	98.01%	12.93%	+85.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	98.01%	12.93%	+85.08%

SPCI vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPCI vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

SPCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.43%, more than OMAH's 15.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.02%	12.86%
SPCI Tuttle Capital Space Industry Income Blast ETF	15.43%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPCI and OMAH in my portfolio?

SPCI and OMAH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPCI or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPCI or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for SPCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPCI or OMAH?

SPCI has the higher dividend yield at 15.43%, compared with 15.02% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between SPCI and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SPCI and 0.95% for OMAH.