SPBW vs. OCTW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SPBW (AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF) and OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Allianz. SPBW is actively managed, while OCTW is passively managed. Over the past year, SPBW returned 10.53% vs 10.80% for OCTW. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SPBW charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for OCTW.

Performance

SPBW vs. OCTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBW achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly lower than OCTW's 5.74% return.

SPBW

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.66%
• 6M: 4.67%
• YTD: 5.34%
• 1Y: 10.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.69%

OCTW

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 0.76%
• 6M: 5.10%
• YTD: 5.74%
• 1Y: 10.80%
• 3Y*: 10.42%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF	$584.65K	$1.46M	$4.73M
SPBW AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF	$347.20K	$445.63K	$406.98K

SPBW vs. OCTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPBW AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF	5.34%	9.64%
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF	5.74%	9.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBW and OCTW is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025	0.93

The correlation between SPBW and OCTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPBW vs. OCTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPBW	OCTW
Technology	37.9%	37.9%
Financial Services	11.7%	11.7%
Communication Services	10.0%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	9.6%
Healthcare	9.1%	9.1%
Industrials	8.4%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.6%
Energy	3.0%	3.0%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

SPBW vs. OCTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPBW

SPBW Risk / Return Rank: 92
SPBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SPBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SPBW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SPBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SPBW Martin Ratio Rank: 94

OCTW

OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 86
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPBW vs. OCTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPBW	OCTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.02	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	2.98	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.40	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.49	2.77	+0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.21	14.05	+4.16

SPBW vs. OCTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBW Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the OCTW Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBW and OCTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPBW vs. OCTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, roughly equal to the maximum OCTW drawdown of -8.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBW and OCTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPBW	OCTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-8.38%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-3.65%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	0.00%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-0.80%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	0.72%	-0.17%

Volatility

SPBW vs. OCTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) is 0.99%, while AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that SPBW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OCTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPBW	OCTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.99%	1.20%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.32%	3.90%	-0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.20%	5.00%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.33%	6.33%	+1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.33%	6.10%	+1.23%

SPBW vs. OCTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBW has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTW's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPBW vs. OCTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPBW nor OCTW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPBW and OCTW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SPBW and OCTW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPBW or OCTW?

OCTW has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to SPBW (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBW dropped -8.76% vs OCTW's -8.38%.

Which ETF is better, SPBW or OCTW?

On 1-year performance, OCTW leads with 10.80% vs 10.53% for SPBW. On fees, OCTW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SPBW has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPBW or OCTW?

Over the 1-year period, OCTW has performed better with a 10.80% return vs 10.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPBW or OCTW?

OCTW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPBW or OCTW?

SPBW and OCTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SPBW and OCTW?

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBW and 0.74% for OCTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.