SPBW vs. FBUF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPBW (AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPBW returned 12.31% vs 19.61% for FBUF. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPBW charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

SPBW vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBW achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 5.32% return.

SPBW

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: 4.44%
• 6M: 5.15%
• 1Y: 12.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBW vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPBW AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF	4.44%	9.57%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	5.32%	13.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBW and FBUF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2025	0.91

The correlation between SPBW and FBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPBW vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBW

SPBW Risk / Return Rank: 90
SPBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SPBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SPBW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SPBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SPBW Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 79
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBW vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPBW	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	2.63	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.56	3.55	+1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.53	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	3.51	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.42	15.68	+7.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPBW vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBW Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBW and FBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPBW	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00	2.63	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	1.47	-0.13

Drawdowns

SPBW vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBW and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPBW	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-11.09%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-5.61%	+2.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.22%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-1.38%	+0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.53%	1.25%	-0.72%

Volatility

SPBW vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) is 0.65%, while Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that SPBW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPBW	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.65%	1.11%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.10%	5.37%	-2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.13%	7.49%	-3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.62%	9.55%	-1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.62%	9.55%	-1.93%

SPBW vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBW has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPBW vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

SPBW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.63%	0.64%	0.54%
SPBW AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPBW and FBUF in my portfolio?

SPBW and FBUF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPBW or FBUF?

FBUF has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to SPBW (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBW dropped -8.76% vs FBUF's -11.09%.

Which ETF is better, SPBW or FBUF?

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 19.61% vs 12.31% for SPBW. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SPBW has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPBW or FBUF?

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 19.61% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPBW or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPBW or FBUF?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for SPBW.

What is the main difference between SPBW and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBW and 0.48% for FBUF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.