SPBW vs. BUFP

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SPBW (AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF) and BUFP (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. SPBW is actively managed, while BUFP is passively managed. Over the past year, SPBW returned 12.82% vs 17.24% for BUFP. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPBW charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUFP.

Performance

SPBW vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBW achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly lower than BUFP's 6.23% return.

SPBW

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 1.34%
• YTD: 4.59%
• 6M: 5.36%
• 1Y: 12.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 6.23%
• 6M: 7.00%
• 1Y: 17.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPBW vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPBW AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF	4.59%	9.57%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	6.23%	12.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBW and BUFP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2025	0.92

The correlation between SPBW and BUFP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPBW vs. BUFP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPBW	BUFP
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SPBW vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPBW

SPBW Risk / Return Rank: 90
SPBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SPBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SPBW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SPBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SPBW Martin Ratio Rank: 93

BUFP

BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 86
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPBW vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPBW	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.12	2.77	+0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.75	4.12	+0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.58	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.55	3.93	+0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.71	21.96	+2.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPBW vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBW Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBW and BUFP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPBW	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.12	2.77	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	1.40	-0.04

Drawdowns

SPBW vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, smaller than the maximum BUFP drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBW and BUFP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPBW	BUFP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-11.98%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-4.41%	+1.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.22%	+0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-1.00%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.53%	0.79%	-0.26%

Volatility

SPBW vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) is 0.69%, while PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that SPBW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPBW	BUFP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.69%	0.95%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.10%	4.82%	-1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.13%	6.27%	-2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	9.49%	-1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.63%	9.49%	-1.86%

SPBW vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBW has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPBW vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

SPBW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%
SPBW AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPBW and BUFP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SPBW and BUFP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPBW or BUFP?

BUFP has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to SPBW (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBW dropped -8.76% vs BUFP's -11.98%.

Which ETF is better, SPBW or BUFP?

On 1-year performance, BUFP leads with 17.24% vs 12.82% for SPBW. On fees, BUFP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPBW has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPBW or BUFP?

Over the 1-year period, BUFP has performed better with a 17.24% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPBW or BUFP?

BUFP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPBW or BUFP?

BUFP has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for SPBW.

What is the main difference between SPBW and BUFP?

They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPBW and 0.50% for BUFP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.