PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPBC vs. NTSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPBC vs. NTSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPBC achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than NTSE's 22.79% return.


SPBC

1D
1.87%
1M
3.91%
6M
10.70%
YTD
10.32%
1Y
16.61%
3Y*
26.39%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.86%

NTSE

1D
2.46%
1M
-0.49%
6M
12.05%
YTD
22.79%
1Y
41.17%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$116.29K$166.66K$193.28K
$833.15K$513.20K$324.41K

SPBC vs. NTSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPBC
Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF
10.32%16.83%37.32%48.04%-28.00%13.87%
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
22.79%36.29%4.42%9.47%-26.31%-5.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SPBC and NTSE is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.60

The correlation between SPBC and NTSE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPBC vs. NTSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPBC
SPBC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SPBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBC Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSE
NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPBC vs. NTSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPBCNTSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.79

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.69

8.50

-3.81

SPBC vs. NTSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPBC Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the NTSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPBC and NTSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPBC vs. NTSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPBC drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum NTSE drawdown of -42.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPBC and NTSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPBCNTSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-42.84%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-14.83%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

-18.73%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.99%

-41.15%

+7.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.19%

+8.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-19.32%

+10.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

4.86%

-1.31%

Volatility

SPBC vs. NTSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF (SPBC) is 4.56%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a volatility of 8.86%. This indicates that SPBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPBCNTSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

8.86%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

22.99%

-10.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

25.19%

-9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.51%

20.26%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

20.04%

+0.24%

SPBC vs. NTSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPBC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPBC vs. NTSE - Dividend Comparison

SPBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than NTSE's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
2.68%3.35%3.23%2.44%3.22%2.10%
SPBC
Simplify US Equity PLUS GBTC ETF
0.81%0.85%0.98%3.79%0.60%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPBC and NTSE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSE has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to SPBC (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPBC dropped -33.99% vs NTSE's -42.84%.

On 5-year performance, SPBC leads with 15.23% vs 5.89% for NTSE. On fees, NTSE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, SPBC has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPBC has performed better with a 15.23% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPBC.

NTSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.81% for SPBC.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPBC and 0.38% for NTSE.

NTSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPBC and NTSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer