SP5L.L vs. IUES.L
SP5L.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc) and IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SP5L.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IUES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SP5L.L returned 15.13%/yr vs 21.71%/yr for IUES.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SP5L.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUES.L.
Performance
SP5L.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SP5L.L is traded in GBP, while IUES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUES.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SP5L.L achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 31.41% return.
SP5L.L
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 29.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- —
IUES.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 28.75%
- 1Y
- 48.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 21.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
SP5L.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc | 10.62% | 9.50% | 27.61% | 19.99% | -8.84% | 31.19% | 13.92% | 26.93% | 0.03% | 6.79% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.98% | 1.99% | 5.69% | -5.60% | 83.32% | 53.38% | -35.31% | 4.67% | -13.27% | 9.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SP5L.L and IUES.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2017 | 0.42 |
The correlation between SP5L.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SP5L.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SP5L.L
IUES.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SP5L.L
IUES.L
-
Financial Services
SP5L.L
IUES.L
-
Communication Services
SP5L.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SP5L.L
IUES.L
-
Healthcare
SP5L.L
IUES.L
-
Industrials
SP5L.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SP5L.L
IUES.L
-
Energy
SP5L.L
IUES.L
Utilities
SP5L.L
IUES.L
-
Real Estate
SP5L.L
IUES.L
-
Basic Materials
SP5L.L
IUES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SP5L.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
SP5L.L
IUES.L
SP5L.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SP5L.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.36 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 2.89 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.64 | 8.95 | +5.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SP5L.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 2.08 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.81 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.36 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
SP5L.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SP5L.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SP5L.L and IUES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SP5L.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -62.40% | +36.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -16.59% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -23.92% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -23.92% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -8.77% | +8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -16.00% | +12.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 5.37% | -3.37% |
Volatility
SP5L.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) is 2.61%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that SP5L.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SP5L.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 8.73% | -6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 19.54% | -12.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.49% | 23.12% | -12.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 26.63% | -12.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 28.23% | -12.39% |
SP5L.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SP5L.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SP5L.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SP5L.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SP5L.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUES.L.
SP5L.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SP5L.L and 0.15% for IUES.L.
Find the right allocation for SP5L.L and IUES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer