SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

SP5L.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc) and CNAL.L (Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR) are both exchange-traded funds - SP5L.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while CNAL.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SP5L.L returned 12.87%/yr vs 4.29%/yr for CNAL.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SP5L.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CNAL.L.

Performance

SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SP5L.L is traded in GBP, while CNAL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNAL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SP5L.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than CNAL.L's 6.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SP5L.L has outperformed CNAL.L with an annualized return of 12.87%, while CNAL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.29% annualized return.

SP5L.L

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -0.32%
• 6M: 9.61%
• YTD: 10.09%
• 1Y: 21.06%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 13.71%
• 10Y*: 12.87%

CNAL.L

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -3.11%
• 6M: 3.34%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 9.00%
• 5Y*: -0.39%
• 10Y*: 4.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc	10.09%	9.50%	27.60%	19.99%	-8.84%	31.19%	13.92%	26.93%	1.00%	-5.12%
CNAL.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR	6.41%	17.54%	12.76%	-18.90%	-17.14%	4.51%	37.96%	32.57%	-26.38%	11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SP5L.L and CNAL.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014	0.29

The correlation between SP5L.L and CNAL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SP5L.L	CNAL.L
Technology	39.0%	33.2%
Financial Services	11.1%	16.8%
Communication Services	10.6%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	4.8%
Healthcare	8.3%	3.8%
Industrials	7.8%	17.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	6.0%
Energy	3.1%	2.7%
Utilities	2.1%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.6%
Basic Materials	1.7%	10.2%

Return for Risk

SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SP5L.L

SP5L.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SP5L.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
SP5L.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SP5L.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SP5L.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

CNAL.L

CNAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
CNAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CNAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CNAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
CNAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CNAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SP5L.L	CNAL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.51	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	2.10	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.13	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.24	9.22	+1.02

SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the CNAL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SP5L.L and CNAL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SP5L.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, smaller than the maximum CNAL.L drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SP5L.L and CNAL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SP5L.L	CNAL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.47%	-51.00%	+25.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.20%	-8.64%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.12%	-26.58%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.12%	-42.38%	+21.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.47%	-45.10%	+19.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-13.52%	+12.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.14%	-26.74%	+21.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	2.93%	-0.88%

Volatility

SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) is 3.14%, while Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that SP5L.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SP5L.L	CNAL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	8.67%	-5.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.95%	13.50%	-5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.09%	17.85%	-6.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.81%	21.66%	-2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	22.03%	-4.07%

SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SP5L.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SP5L.L vs. CNAL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SP5L.L nor CNAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SP5L.L and CNAL.L in my portfolio?

SP5L.L and CNAL.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SP5L.L or CNAL.L?

On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SP5L.L or CNAL.L?

SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CNAL.L.

What is the main difference between SP5L.L and CNAL.L?

SP5L.L is categorized as S&P 500, while CNAL.L is China Equities. SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while CNAL.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SP5L.L and 0.35% for CNAL.L.