SP5L.L vs. 5ESG.L
SP5L.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc) and 5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) are both S&P 500 funds - SP5L.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while 5ESG.L tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SP5L.L returned 13.71%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for 5ESG.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SP5L.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for 5ESG.L.
Performance
SP5L.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SP5L.L is traded in GBP, while 5ESG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 5ESG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SP5L.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.L's 9.11% return.
SP5L.L
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
5ESG.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SP5L.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc | 10.09% | 9.50% | 27.60% | 19.99% | -8.84% | 31.19% | 13.92% | 16.58% |
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 9.11% | 18.26% | 23.62% | 26.17% | -20.24% | 31.59% | 15.83% | 16.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SP5L.L and 5ESG.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SP5L.L and 5ESG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
SP5L.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Financial Services
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Communication Services
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Cyclical
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Healthcare
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Industrials
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Defensive
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Energy
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Utilities
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Real Estate
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Basic Materials
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SP5L.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SP5L.L
5ESG.L
SP5L.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SP5L.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.54 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.24 | 10.84 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SP5L.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SP5L.L drawdown since its inception was -25.47%, smaller than the maximum 5ESG.L drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SP5L.L and 5ESG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SP5L.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -36.07% | +10.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -9.01% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -19.53% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -25.41% | +4.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.96% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -5.34% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 2.12% | -0.07% |
Volatility
SP5L.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) at 2.77%. This indicates that SP5L.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SP5L.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.77% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | 9.38% | -1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 11.94% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 16.24% | +2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 18.00% | -0.04% |
SP5L.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SP5L.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SP5L.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison
SP5L.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 0.62% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.39% |
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SP5L.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SP5L.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
Find the right allocation for SP5L.L and 5ESG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer