PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SP2Q.DE vs. ZA30.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SP2Q.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SP2Q.DE achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly lower than ZA30.DE's 11.16% return.


SP2Q.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
4.59%
YTD
10.37%
6M
10.95%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*

ZA30.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
5.42%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.63%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SP2Q.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SP2Q.DE
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
10.37%-0.55%18.83%9.91%-3.45%
ZA30.DE
iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.16%5.34%31.19%24.10%-5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SP2Q.DE and ZA30.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2022

0.76

The correlation between SP2Q.DE and ZA30.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SP2Q.DE vs. ZA30.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SP2Q.DE
SP2Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SP2Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ZA30.DE
ZA30.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZA30.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SP2Q.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SP2Q.DEZA30.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

4.12

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

15.63

-5.39

SP2Q.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SP2Q.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the ZA30.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SP2Q.DE and ZA30.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SP2Q.DEZA30.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.47

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.18

-0.43

Drawdowns

SP2Q.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SP2Q.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, roughly equal to the maximum ZA30.DE drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SP2Q.DE and ZA30.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SP2Q.DEZA30.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.73%

-23.45%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-6.91%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.73%

-23.45%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-3.22%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.83%

-0.12%

Volatility

SP2Q.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE) is 2.04%, while iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that SP2Q.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZA30.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SP2Q.DEZA30.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

2.73%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.81%

7.54%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.66%

11.54%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

14.38%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

14.38%

+1.06%

SP2Q.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SP2Q.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ZA30.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SP2Q.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SP2Q.DE nor ZA30.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SP2Q.DE and ZA30.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZA30.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZA30.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SP2Q.DE.

SP2Q.DE tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight, while ZA30.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SP2Q.DE and 0.07% for ZA30.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SP2Q.DE and ZA30.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer