PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SP2Q.DE vs. IS31.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SP2Q.DE vs. IS31.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IS31.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SP2Q.DE achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly higher than IS31.DE's 2.57% return.


SP2Q.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.80%
6M
10.50%
YTD
14.11%
1Y
19.92%
3Y*
12.86%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*

IS31.DE

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.28%
6M
3.07%
YTD
2.57%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
10.43%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SP2Q.DE vs. IS31.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SP2Q.DE
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
14.11%-0.55%18.83%9.91%-6.71%31.96%
IS31.DE
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
2.57%9.27%16.79%6.75%-14.54%16.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SP2Q.DE and IS31.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021

0.73

The correlation between SP2Q.DE and IS31.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SP2Q.DE vs. IS31.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SP2Q.DE
SP2Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SP2Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IS31.DE
IS31.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IS31.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS31.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS31.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IS31.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS31.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SP2Q.DE vs. IS31.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IS31.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SP2Q.DEIS31.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.17

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

1.25

+2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

4.77

+7.33

SP2Q.DE vs. IS31.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SP2Q.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the IS31.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SP2Q.DE and IS31.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SP2Q.DE vs. IS31.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SP2Q.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, smaller than the maximum IS31.DE drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SP2Q.DE and IS31.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SP2Q.DEIS31.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.73%

-33.66%

+10.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-6.64%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.73%

-12.56%

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.73%

-20.75%

-1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-1.01%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-4.83%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.75%

-0.09%

Volatility

SP2Q.DE vs. IS31.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (IS31.DE) at 2.40%. This indicates that SP2Q.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS31.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SP2Q.DEIS31.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

2.40%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

6.55%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

8.70%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.95%

12.78%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

14.36%

+1.00%

SP2Q.DE vs. IS31.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SP2Q.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IS31.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SP2Q.DE vs. IS31.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SP2Q.DE nor IS31.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SP2Q.DE and IS31.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SP2Q.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SP2Q.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IS31.DE.

SP2Q.DE tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight, while IS31.DE tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SP2Q.DE and 0.25% for IS31.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SP2Q.DE and IS31.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer