PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SP2Q.DE vs. BNXG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SP2Q.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SP2Q.DE achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly lower than BNXG.DE's 25.60% return.


SP2Q.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
4.59%
YTD
10.37%
6M
10.95%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*

BNXG.DE

1D
-2.38%
1M
9.75%
YTD
25.60%
6M
16.57%
1Y
57.31%
3Y*
42.07%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SP2Q.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SP2Q.DE
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc
10.37%-0.55%18.83%9.91%-6.71%31.98%
BNXG.DE
Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc
25.60%30.08%24.44%61.89%-49.28%-10.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SP2Q.DE and BNXG.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021

0.51

The correlation between SP2Q.DE and BNXG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SP2Q.DE vs. BNXG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SP2Q.DE
SP2Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SP2Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP2Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BNXG.DE
BNXG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BNXG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNXG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SP2Q.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SP2Q.DEBNXG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.92

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

3.89

+6.35

SP2Q.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SP2Q.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the BNXG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SP2Q.DE and BNXG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SP2Q.DEBNXG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.43

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.34

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.66

+0.09

Drawdowns

SP2Q.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SP2Q.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, smaller than the maximum BNXG.DE drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SP2Q.DE and BNXG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SP2Q.DEBNXG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.73%

-57.23%

+34.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-29.72%

+24.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.73%

-38.54%

+15.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.73%

-57.23%

+34.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.77%

+4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-21.04%

+15.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

14.69%

-12.98%

Volatility

SP2Q.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SP2Q.DE) is 2.04%, while Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BNXG.DE) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that SP2Q.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNXG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SP2Q.DEBNXG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

9.95%

-7.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.81%

25.00%

-18.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.66%

39.88%

-29.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

36.22%

-21.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

35.37%

-19.93%

SP2Q.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SP2Q.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BNXG.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SP2Q.DE vs. BNXG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SP2Q.DE nor BNXG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SP2Q.DE and BNXG.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SP2Q.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SP2Q.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BNXG.DE.

SP2Q.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while BNXG.DE is Technology Equities. SP2Q.DE tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight, while BNXG.DE tracks CoinShares Blockchain Global Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SP2Q.DE and 0.65% for BNXG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SP2Q.DE and BNXG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer