PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SP20.AS vs. XNAS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SP20.AS vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SP20.AS) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SP20.AS vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SP20.AS
iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc
-10.91%19.56%5.33%
XNAS.L
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
-6.70%5.61%5.99%
Different Trading Currencies

SP20.AS is traded in EUR, while XNAS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XNAS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SP20.AS achieves a -10.91% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.L's -6.70% return.


SP20.AS

1D
1.28%
1M
-6.28%
YTD
-10.91%
6M
-6.93%
1Y
22.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XNAS.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
-6.70%
6M
-3.45%
1Y
15.17%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SP20.AS vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SP20.AS and XNAS.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SP20.AS vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SP20.AS
SP20.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SP20.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP20.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP20.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SP20.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP20.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XNAS.L
XNAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SP20.AS vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SP20.AS) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SP20.ASXNAS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

0.73

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

1.12

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.15

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.21

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.28

3.62

+3.66

SP20.AS vs. XNAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SP20.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SP20.AS and XNAS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SP20.ASXNAS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

0.73

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.97

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between SP20.AS and XNAS.L is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SP20.AS vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SP20.AS nor XNAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SP20.AS vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SP20.AS drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, smaller than the maximum XNAS.L drawdown of -26.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SP20.AS and XNAS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SP20.ASXNAS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.48%

-22.92%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-12.62%

-0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.25%

-10.47%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-3.11%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

3.01%

+0.36%

Volatility

SP20.AS vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SP20.AS) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SP20.ASXNAS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.83%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

11.89%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.13%

20.59%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.37%

19.61%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

19.61%

-0.24%