PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOYB.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOYB.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Soybeans (SOYB.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOYB.L achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SOYB.L has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 0.60%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.


SOYB.L

1D
-3.37%
1M
-7.15%
YTD
4.56%
6M
-1.94%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
-1.51%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
0.60%

GLD

1D
0.83%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
3.77%
6M
6.24%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
31.19%
5Y*
18.35%
10Y*
13.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOYB.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SOYB.L
WisdomTree Soybeans
4.56%6.31%-22.14%0.92%27.00%7.10%31.50%-2.64%-11.79%-10.13%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
3.77%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SOYB.L and GLD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2006

0.11

The correlation between SOYB.L and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SOYB.L vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SOYB.L
GLD

Communication Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

SOYB.L
100.0%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

SOYB.L

-

GLD
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SOYB.L

-

GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

SOYB.L

-

GLD

-

Energy

SOYB.L

-

GLD

-

Financial Services

SOYB.L

-

GLD

-

Healthcare

SOYB.L

-

GLD

-

Industrials

SOYB.L

-

GLD

-

Real Estate

SOYB.L

-

GLD

-

Technology

SOYB.L

-

GLD

-

Utilities

SOYB.L

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOYB.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOYB.L
SOYB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SOYB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOYB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOYB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SOYB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOYB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOYB.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Soybeans (SOYB.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOYB.LGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.69

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

4.15

-2.67

SOYB.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOYB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOYB.L and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOYB.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.22

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

1.02

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.83

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.60

-0.36

Drawdowns

SOYB.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOYB.L drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB.L and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOYB.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-45.56%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-19.21%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.36%

-19.21%

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.36%

-21.03%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.61%

-22.00%

-22.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.74%

-17.07%

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.92%

-16.16%

-5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

7.81%

-3.01%

Volatility

SOYB.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Soybeans (SOYB.L) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.50%. This indicates that SOYB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOYB.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

5.50%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.00%

23.16%

-11.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

26.60%

-10.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

18.00%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

15.95%

+2.77%

SOYB.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOYB.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOYB.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither SOYB.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SOYB.L and GLD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SOYB.L.

SOYB.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while GLD is Gold. SOYB.L tracks Bloomberg Soybeans, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SOYB.L and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOYB.L and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer