SOXX vs. FYLD
SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index, while FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. SOXX is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOXX returned 35.55%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for FYLD. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOXX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.
Performance
SOXX vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXX achieves a 98.11% return, which is significantly higher than FYLD's 19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXX has outperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 35.55%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 98.11%
- 6M
- 99.51%
- 1Y
- 164.50%
- 3Y*
- 53.00%
- 5Y*
- 33.69%
- 10Y*
- 35.55%
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 38.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
SOXX vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 98.11% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.96% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXX and FYLD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SOXX and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SOXX vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXX
FYLD
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SOXX
FYLD
Basic Materials
SOXX
-
FYLD
Communication Services
SOXX
-
FYLD
Consumer Cyclical
SOXX
-
FYLD
Consumer Defensive
SOXX
-
FYLD
Energy
SOXX
-
FYLD
Financial Services
SOXX
-
FYLD
Healthcare
SOXX
-
FYLD
-
Industrials
SOXX
-
FYLD
Real Estate
SOXX
-
FYLD
-
Utilities
SOXX
-
FYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXX vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
SOXX
FYLD
SOXX vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXX | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.58 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.50 | 7.11 | +3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.20 | 25.06 | +13.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXX vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXX drawdown since its inception was -70.21%, which is greater than FYLD's maximum drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXX and FYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXX | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.21% | -44.55% | -25.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.77% | -5.44% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.36% | -15.15% | -26.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.75% | -25.12% | -20.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.75% | -44.55% | -1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -0.33% | -2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -8.81% | -11.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 1.54% | +2.79% |
Volatility
SOXX vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a higher volatility of 19.42% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 3.71%. This indicates that SOXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXX | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.42% | 3.71% | +15.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.46% | 9.21% | +22.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 11.82% | +25.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.73% | 16.27% | +20.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.77% | 18.01% | +15.76% |
SOXX vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXX vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
SOXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than FYLD's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.60% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXX and FYLD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (19.42%) compared to FYLD (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXX dropped -70.21% vs FYLD's -44.55%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.55% vs 12.08% for FYLD. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.55% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.
SOXX is categorized as Semiconductors, while FYLD is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for SOXX and 0.59% for FYLD.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.43 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXX and FYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer