SOXU.TO vs. AMHE.TO
SOXU.TO (MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF) and AMHE.TO (Harvest Amazon Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SOXU.TO is passively managed, while AMHE.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, SOXU.TO returned 1463.55% vs 27.55% for AMHE.TO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOXU.TO charges 1.81%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for AMHE.TO.
Performance
SOXU.TO vs. AMHE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXU.TO achieves a 499.09% return, which is significantly higher than AMHE.TO's 10.09% return.
SOXU.TO
- 1D
- -6.24%
- 1M
- 86.36%
- YTD
- 499.09%
- 6M
- 462.27%
- 1Y
- 1,463.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMHE.TO
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXU.TO vs. AMHE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOXU.TO MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF | 499.09% | 169.76% |
AMHE.TO Harvest Amazon Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 10.09% | 19.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXU.TO and AMHE.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXU.TO vs. AMHE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SOXU.TO
AMHE.TO
SOXU.TO vs. AMHE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF (SOXU.TO) and Harvest Amazon Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AMHE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOXU.TO | AMHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +13.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.17 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 34.61 | 1.10 | +33.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 116.37 | 2.84 | +113.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOXU.TO | AMHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51 | 0.86 | +13.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 13.84 | 0.73 | +13.11 |
Drawdowns
SOXU.TO vs. AMHE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXU.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.78%, which is greater than AMHE.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXU.TO and AMHE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXU.TO | AMHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.78% | -36.83% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.78% | -25.14% | -17.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.24% | -8.33% | +2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -10.66% | +2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.70% | 9.72% | +2.98% |
Volatility
SOXU.TO vs. AMHE.TO - Volatility Comparison
MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF (SOXU.TO) has a higher volatility of 40.56% compared to Harvest Amazon Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AMHE.TO) at 9.94%. This indicates that SOXU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMHE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXU.TO | AMHE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.56% | 9.94% | +30.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.38% | 22.49% | +58.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.09% | 32.12% | +69.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.29% | 35.95% | +65.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.29% | 35.95% | +65.34% |
SOXU.TO vs. AMHE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXU.TO has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is lower than AMHE.TO's 1.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXU.TO vs. AMHE.TO - Dividend Comparison
SOXU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMHE.TO Harvest Amazon Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 14.14% | 14.31% | 4.24% |
SOXU.TO MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXU.TO and AMHE.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOXU.TO is cheaper at 1.81% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOXU.TO is cheaper with a 1.81% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for AMHE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: LongPoint and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 1.81% for SOXU.TO and 1.88% for AMHE.TO.
Find the right allocation for SOXU.TO and AMHE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer