PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOXQ vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOXQ vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOXQ achieves a 86.16% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.59% return.


SOXQ

1D
7.93%
1M
12.42%
YTD
86.16%
6M
77.88%
1Y
153.11%
3Y*
54.47%
5Y*
33.82%
10Y*

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOXQ vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
86.16%43.11%20.16%66.74%-35.59%25.19%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.59%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SOXQ and SGOV is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021

-0.01

The correlation between SOXQ and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOXQ vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOXQ vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOXQSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-270.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

195.05

-193.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.88

397.15

-387.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.94

4,450.29

-4,414.35

SOXQ vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOXQ Sharpe Ratio is 4.19, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOXQ and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOXQ vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOXQ drawdown since its inception was -46.01%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXQ and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOXQSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.01%

-0.03%

-45.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-0.01%

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

-0.01%

-39.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.01%

-0.03%

-45.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.37%

0.00%

-5.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-0.00%

-12.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

0.00%

+4.28%

Volatility

SOXQ vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a higher volatility of 18.87% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that SOXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOXQSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.87%

0.05%

+18.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.66%

0.13%

+30.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.78%

0.20%

+36.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.90%

0.24%

+36.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.88%

0.24%

+36.64%

SOXQ vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOXQ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SOXQ vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.27%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOXQ and SGOV have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (18.87%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXQ dropped -46.01% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 33.82% vs 3.55% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 33.82% return vs 3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOXQ.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.27% for SOXQ.

SOXQ is categorized as Semiconductors, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SOXQ and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.22 vs 4.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOXQ and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer