SOXL vs. FNGG
SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) and FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index while FNGG tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (2x Leveraged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SOXL returned 133.82%/yr vs 58.90%/yr for FNGG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOXL charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for FNGG.
Performance
SOXL vs. FNGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXL achieves a 525.03% return, which is significantly higher than FNGG's 23.30% return.
SOXL
- 1D
- -6.36%
- 1M
- 82.23%
- YTD
- 525.03%
- 6M
- 481.71%
- 1Y
- 1,280.87%
- 3Y*
- 133.82%
- 5Y*
- 46.78%
- 10Y*
- 64.43%
FNGG
- 1D
- -4.34%
- 1M
- 15.65%
- YTD
- 23.30%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 47.84%
- 3Y*
- 58.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL vs. FNGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 525.03% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 69.90% |
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 23.30% | 27.21% | 98.76% | 204.23% | -87.15% | -3.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXL and FNGG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between SOXL and FNGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SOXL vs. FNGG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXL
FNGG
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SOXL
FNGG
Basic Materials
SOXL
-
FNGG
-
Communication Services
SOXL
-
FNGG
Consumer Cyclical
SOXL
-
FNGG
Consumer Defensive
SOXL
-
FNGG
-
Energy
SOXL
-
FNGG
-
Financial Services
SOXL
-
FNGG
-
Healthcare
SOXL
-
FNGG
-
Industrials
SOXL
-
FNGG
-
Real Estate
SOXL
-
FNGG
-
Utilities
SOXL
-
FNGG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXL vs. FNGG — Risk / Return Rank
SOXL
FNGG
SOXL vs. FNGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOXL | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +11.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.21 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 29.80 | 1.12 | +28.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 102.14 | 2.95 | +99.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOXL | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69 | 1.21 | +11.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.05 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
SOXL vs. FNGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXL drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGG drawdown of -91.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXL and FNGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXL | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.46% | -91.33% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.47% | -43.01% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.88% | -47.03% | -40.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.36% | -8.81% | +2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.01% | -56.00% | +20.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.66% | 16.25% | -3.59% |
Volatility
SOXL vs. FNGG - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a higher volatility of 41.05% compared to Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) at 12.57%. This indicates that SOXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXL | FNGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.05% | 12.57% | +28.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.57% | 30.87% | +50.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.16% | 39.86% | +62.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.25% | 67.64% | +39.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.05% | 67.64% | +31.41% |
SOXL vs. FNGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGG's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXL vs. FNGG - Dividend Comparison
SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than FNGG's 9.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 9.61% | 11.89% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 4.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXL and FNGG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (41.05%) compared to FNGG (12.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXL dropped -90.46% vs FNGG's -91.33%.
On 3-year performance, SOXL leads with 133.82% vs 58.90% for FNGG. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FNGG has been the lower-risk option at 12.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 133.82% return vs 58.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for FNGG.
FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 9.61%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index, while FNGG tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (2x Leveraged). Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOXL and 0.98% for FNGG.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.69 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXL and FNGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer