SOXL vs. FAS
SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index while FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOXL returned 68.12%/yr vs 23.27%/yr for FAS. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOXL charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FAS.
Performance
SOXL vs. FAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXL achieves a 501.02% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -12.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXL has outperformed FAS with an annualized return of 68.12%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively lower 23.27% annualized return.
SOXL
- 1D
- 10.04%
- 1M
- 11.88%
- YTD
- 501.02%
- 6M
- 471.39%
- 1Y
- 928.01%
- 3Y*
- 126.70%
- 5Y*
- 44.97%
- 10Y*
- 68.12%
FAS
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 9.03%
- YTD
- -12.41%
- 6M
- -17.05%
- 1Y
- -0.01%
- 3Y*
- 41.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- 23.27%
SOXL vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 501.02% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -12.41% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXL and FAS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SOXL and FAS has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SOXL vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXL
FAS
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SOXL
FAS
Basic Materials
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Communication Services
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Consumer Defensive
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Energy
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Financial Services
SOXL
-
FAS
Healthcare
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Industrials
SOXL
-
FAS
Real Estate
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Utilities
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXL vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank
SOXL
FAS
SOXL vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.04 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.57 | -0.00 | +21.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 68.63 | -0.00 | +68.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXL vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXL drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, roughly equal to the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXL and FAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.46% | -91.61% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.47% | -40.88% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.88% | -43.10% | -44.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.46% | -66.88% | -23.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.46% | -85.99% | -4.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.01% | -19.63% | +3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.94% | -31.10% | -3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.64% | 18.25% | -4.61% |
Volatility
SOXL vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a higher volatility of 66.73% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) at 12.50%. This indicates that SOXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 66.73% | 12.50% | +54.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 99.97% | 33.26% | +66.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 116.70% | 43.04% | +73.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.41% | 55.31% | +55.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.63% | 61.16% | +39.47% |
SOXL vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXL vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison
SOXL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.58% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXL and FAS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (66.73%) compared to FAS (12.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXL dropped -90.46% vs FAS's -91.61%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 68.12% vs 23.27% for FAS. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 68.12% return vs 23.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.58%, compared with 0.00% for SOXL.
SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index, while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOXL and 1.00% for FAS.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.03 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXL and FAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer