SOXL vs. FAS
SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index while FAS tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOXL returned 53.10%/yr vs 22.15%/yr for FAS. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOXL charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FAS.
Performance
SOXL vs. FAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXL achieves a 239.00% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's 3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXL has outperformed FAS with an annualized return of 53.10%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively lower 22.15% annualized return.
SOXL
- 1D
- -13.94%
- 1M
- -37.01%
- 6M
- 145.32%
- YTD
- 239.00%
- 1Y
- 427.27%
- 3Y*
- 72.95%
- 5Y*
- 31.92%
- 10Y*
- 53.10%
FAS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 41.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- 22.15%
SOXL vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 239.00% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | 3.74% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXL and FAS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SOXL and FAS has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SOXL vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOXL
FAS
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SOXL
FAS
Basic Materials
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Communication Services
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Consumer Cyclical
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Consumer Defensive
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Energy
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Financial Services
SOXL
-
FAS
Healthcare
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Industrials
SOXL
-
FAS
Real Estate
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Utilities
SOXL
-
FAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXL vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank
SOXL
FAS
SOXL vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOXL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.09 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.19 | 0.37 | +7.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.43 | 0.81 | +25.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOXL vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXL drawdown since its inception was -90.46%, roughly equal to the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXL and FAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.46% | -91.61% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.63% | -40.88% | -11.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.88% | -43.10% | -44.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.46% | -66.88% | -23.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.46% | -85.99% | -4.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.63% | -4.82% | -47.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -31.03% | -3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.27% | 18.44% | -2.17% |
Volatility
SOXL vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a higher volatility of 60.71% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) at 12.36%. This indicates that SOXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 60.71% | 12.36% | +48.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 109.63% | 33.36% | +76.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.91% | 43.46% | +81.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 112.01% | 55.20% | +56.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.43% | 61.07% | +40.36% |
SOXL vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXL vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison
SOXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than FAS's 8.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF | 8.09% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.01% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXL and FAS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (60.71%) compared to FAS (12.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXL dropped -90.46% vs FAS's -91.61%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 53.10% vs 22.15% for FAS. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 53.10% return vs 22.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 8.09%, compared with 0.01% for SOXL.
SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index, while FAS tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SOXL and 0.88% for FAS.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXL and FAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer