SOUN vs. RKLB
SOUN (SoundHound AI, Inc.) and RKLB (Rocket Lab USA, Inc.) are both stocks. SOUN operates in Software - Application (Technology), while RKLB operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, SOUN returned 29.87%/yr vs 158.32%/yr for RKLB. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SOUN vs. RKLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOUN achieves a -30.79% return, which is significantly lower than RKLB's 46.77% return.
SOUN
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -30.79%
- 6M
- -40.77%
- 1Y
- -27.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RKLB
- 1D
- -10.79%
- 1M
- -17.53%
- YTD
- 46.77%
- 6M
- 66.51%
- 1Y
- 287.84%
- 3Y*
- 158.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOUN vs. RKLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | -30.79% | -49.75% | 835.85% | 19.77% | -79.70% |
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc. | 46.77% | 173.89% | 360.58% | 46.68% | -48.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOUN and RKLB is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.43 |
The correlation between SOUN and RKLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SOUN:
$2.34B
RKLB:
$61.99B
SOUN:
-$0.43
RKLB:
-$0.33
SOUN:
14.72
RKLB:
83.69
SOUN:
5.07
RKLB:
27.38
SOUN:
$183.99M
RKLB:
$679.58M
SOUN:
$69.84M
RKLB:
$248.43M
SOUN:
-$124.47M
RKLB:
-$177.36M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOUN vs. RKLB — Risk / Return Rank
SOUN
RKLB
SOUN vs. RKLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) and Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOUN | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.38 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 6.74 | -7.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 15.44 | -16.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOUN vs. RKLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOUN drawdown since its inception was -93.55%, which is greater than RKLB's maximum drawdown of -82.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOUN and RKLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOUN | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.55% | -82.96% | -10.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.43% | -43.01% | -29.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.65% | -55.49% | -20.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.52% | -31.84% | -39.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.93% | -51.29% | -15.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.29% | 18.75% | +26.54% |
Volatility
SOUN vs. RKLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) is 17.69%, while Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) has a volatility of 31.54%. This indicates that SOUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RKLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOUN | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.69% | 31.54% | -13.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.15% | 73.47% | -21.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.70% | 93.03% | -12.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.27% | 81.62% | +54.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.27% | 81.62% | +54.65% |
Dividends
SOUN vs. RKLB - Dividend Comparison
Neither SOUN nor RKLB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SOUN vs. RKLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SoundHound AI, Inc. and Rocket Lab USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SOUN and RKLB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RKLB has higher volatility (31.54%) compared to SOUN (17.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOUN dropped -93.55% vs RKLB's -82.96%.
RKLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOUN and RKLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer