SOLZ vs. ZVOL
SOLZ (Solana ETF) and ZVOL (Volatility Premium Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while ZVOL is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid Term Futures Inverse Daily Index. SOLZ is actively managed, while ZVOL is passively managed. Over the past year, SOLZ returned -62.81% vs 13.05% for ZVOL. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SOLZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZVOL.
Performance
SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLZ achieves a -42.41% return, which is significantly lower than ZVOL's 3.18% return.
SOLZ
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- 6M
- -42.81%
- YTD
- -42.41%
- 1Y
- -62.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -40.67%
ZVOL
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- 4.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
SOLZ Solana ETF | $5.01M | $5.69M | $8.57M |
| $585.11K | $389.96K | $359.46K |
SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLZ Solana ETF | -42.41% | -14.53% |
ZVOL Volatility Premium Plus ETF | 3.18% | -3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLZ and ZVOL is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLZ vs. ZVOL — Risk / Return Rank
SOLZ
ZVOL
SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solana ETF (SOLZ) and Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOLZ | ZVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.13 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 0.80 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 2.56 | -3.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLZ drawdown since its inception was -75.68%, which is greater than ZVOL's maximum drawdown of -37.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLZ and ZVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLZ | ZVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.68% | -37.25% | -38.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.68% | -16.46% | -59.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.17% | -17.81% | -54.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -13.62% | -24.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.65% | 5.12% | +48.53% |
Volatility
SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Volatility Comparison
Solana ETF (SOLZ) has a higher volatility of 12.42% compared to Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) at 3.69%. This indicates that SOLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLZ | ZVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.42% | 3.69% | +8.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.91% | 13.67% | +37.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.12% | 18.81% | +54.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.21% | 28.76% | +46.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.21% | 28.76% | +46.45% |
SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ZVOL's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Dividend Comparison
SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than ZVOL's 75.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SOLZ Solana ETF | 3.74% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZVOL Volatility Premium Plus ETF | 75.96% | 53.44% | 30.68% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLZ and ZVOL have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOLZ has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to ZVOL (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLZ dropped -75.68% vs ZVOL's -37.25%.
On 1-year performance, ZVOL leads with 13.05% vs -62.81% for SOLZ. On fees, SOLZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ZVOL has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZVOL has performed better with a 13.05% return vs -62.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOLZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZVOL.
ZVOL has the higher dividend yield at 75.96%, compared with 3.74% for SOLZ.
SOLZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ZVOL is Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SOLZ and 1.35% for ZVOL.
ZVOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOLZ and ZVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer