PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOLZ vs. ZVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solana ETF (SOLZ) and Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLZ achieves a -42.90% return, which is significantly lower than ZVOL's -2.29% return.


SOLZ

1D
-4.69%
1M
-15.18%
YTD
-42.90%
6M
-50.08%
1Y
-59.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZVOL

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
2.14%
1Y
8.27%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SOLZ
Solana ETF
-42.90%-12.47%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
-2.29%-4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLZ and ZVOL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOLZ vs. ZVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLZ
SOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ZVOL
ZVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ZVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solana ETF (SOLZ) and Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOLZZVOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.09

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

0.50

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.29

1.62

-2.91

SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the ZVOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLZ and ZVOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOLZZVOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

0.44

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.58

0.43

-1.01

Drawdowns

SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLZ drawdown since its inception was -72.41%, which is greater than ZVOL's maximum drawdown of -37.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLZ and ZVOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOLZZVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.41%

-37.25%

-35.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.41%

-16.46%

-55.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.41%

-22.17%

-50.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.11%

-13.43%

-20.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.03%

5.12%

+40.91%

Volatility

SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Volatility Comparison

Solana ETF (SOLZ) has a higher volatility of 16.15% compared to Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) at 3.59%. This indicates that SOLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOLZZVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.15%

3.59%

+12.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.76%

13.27%

+37.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.02%

18.74%

+55.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.07%

29.27%

+46.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.07%

29.27%

+46.80%

SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ZVOL's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOLZ vs. ZVOL - Dividend Comparison

SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than ZVOL's 71.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
SOLZ
Solana ETF
3.92%1.75%0.00%0.00%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
71.14%53.44%30.68%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOLZ and ZVOL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOLZ has higher volatility (16.15%) compared to ZVOL (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLZ dropped -72.41% vs ZVOL's -37.25%.

On 1-year performance, ZVOL leads with 8.27% vs -59.43% for SOLZ. On fees, SOLZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ZVOL has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZVOL has performed better with a 8.27% return vs -59.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOLZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZVOL.

ZVOL has the higher dividend yield at 71.14%, compared with 3.92% for SOLZ.

SOLZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ZVOL is Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SOLZ and 1.35% for ZVOL.

ZVOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOLZ and ZVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer