SOLZ vs. SETH

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

SOLZ (Solana ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SOLZ is actively managed, while SETH is passively managed. Over the past year, SOLZ returned -62.81% vs 35.20% for SETH. Their -0.87 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

SOLZ vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solana ETF (SOLZ) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLZ achieves a -42.41% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 28.26% return.

SOLZ

• 1D: -2.29%
• 1M: -4.56%
• 6M: -42.81%
• YTD: -42.41%
• 1Y: -62.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -40.67%

SETH

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -15.37%
• 6M: 32.07%
• YTD: 28.26%
• 1Y: 35.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -31.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	$1.23M	$1.20M	$1.90M
SOLZ Solana ETF	$5.01M	$5.69M	$8.57M

SOLZ vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOLZ Solana ETF	-42.41%	-14.53%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	28.26%	-52.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLZ and SETH is -0.89, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	-0.87

The correlation between SOLZ and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.89 to -0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SOLZ vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLZ

SOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
SOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 27
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 28
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLZ vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solana ETF (SOLZ) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOLZ	SETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.86	0.53	-1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.37	1.13	-2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.14	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	1.14	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	2.01	-3.18

SOLZ vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLZ and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOLZ vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLZ drawdown since its inception was -75.68%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLZ and SETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOLZ	SETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.68%	-80.74%	+5.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.68%	-30.96%	-44.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.17%	-64.77%	-7.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.22%	-55.07%	+16.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.65%	17.58%	+36.07%

Volatility

SOLZ vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Solana ETF (SOLZ) is 12.42%, while ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a volatility of 13.43%. This indicates that SOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOLZ	SETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.42%	13.43%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.91%	46.09%	+4.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.12%	67.11%	+6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.21%	68.95%	+6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.21%	68.95%	+6.26%

SOLZ vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SOLZ and SETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

SOLZ vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than SETH's 17.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	17.40%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%
SOLZ Solana ETF	3.74%	1.75%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOLZ and SETH in my portfolio?

SOLZ and SETH have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOLZ or SETH?

SETH has higher volatility (13.43%) compared to SOLZ (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLZ dropped -75.68% vs SETH's -80.74%.

Which ETF is better, SOLZ or SETH?

On 1-year performance, SETH leads with 35.20% vs -62.81% for SOLZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 12.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOLZ or SETH?

Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a 35.20% return vs -62.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOLZ or SETH?

SOLZ and SETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOLZ or SETH?

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 17.40%, compared with 3.74% for SOLZ.

What is the main difference between SOLZ and SETH?

They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.