PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOLZ vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOLZ vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solana ETF (SOLZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLZ achieves a -44.90% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 1.99% return.


SOLZ

1D
-3.31%
1M
-17.87%
YTD
-44.90%
6M
-41.51%
1Y
-56.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.11%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLZ vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SOLZ
Solana ETF
-44.90%-14.53%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.99%3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLZ and IBID is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOLZ vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLZ
SOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLZ vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solana ETF (SOLZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOLZIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.77

-0.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

8.54

-9.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

33.17

-34.33

SOLZ vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLZ and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOLZ vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLZ drawdown since its inception was -75.68%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLZ and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOLZIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.68%

-1.28%

-74.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.68%

-0.49%

-75.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.38%

-0.49%

-72.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.40%

-0.22%

-35.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.46%

0.13%

+48.33%

Volatility

SOLZ vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Solana ETF (SOLZ) has a higher volatility of 21.45% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.36%. This indicates that SOLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOLZIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.45%

0.36%

+21.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.82%

0.86%

+50.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.42%

1.24%

+73.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.57%

2.25%

+74.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.57%

2.25%

+74.32%

SOLZ vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOLZ vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%
SOLZ
Solana ETF
4.26%1.75%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOLZ and IBID have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOLZ has higher volatility (21.45%) compared to IBID (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLZ dropped -75.68% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 4.20% vs -56.29% for SOLZ. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 4.20% return vs -56.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SOLZ.

SOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 3.68% for IBID.

SOLZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SOLZ and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOLZ and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer