SOLZ vs. ARKW

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

SOLZ (Solana ETF) and ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOLZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOLZ returned -62.81% vs -12.08% for ARKW. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SOLZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ARKW.

Performance

SOLZ vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solana ETF (SOLZ) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOLZ achieves a -42.41% return, which is significantly lower than ARKW's -8.75% return.

SOLZ

• 1D: -2.29%
• 1M: -4.56%
• 6M: -42.81%
• YTD: -42.41%
• 1Y: -62.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -40.67%

ARKW

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: -6.40%
• 6M: -7.02%
• YTD: -8.75%
• 1Y: -12.08%
• 3Y*: 27.84%
• 5Y*: -1.46%
• 10Y*: 20.88%
• ALL TIME*: 19.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	$9.49M	$12.43M	$14.15M
SOLZ Solana ETF	$5.01M	$5.69M	$8.57M

SOLZ vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SOLZ Solana ETF	-42.41%	-14.53%
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	-8.75%	53.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SOLZ and ARKW is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	0.61

The correlation between SOLZ and ARKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SOLZ vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOLZ

SOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
SOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

ARKW

ARKW Risk / Return Rank: 7
ARKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ARKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ARKW Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ARKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
ARKW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOLZ vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solana ETF (SOLZ) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOLZ	ARKW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.86	-0.36	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.37	-0.30	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.97	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	-0.34	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	-0.63	-0.54

SOLZ vs. ARKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the ARKW Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOLZ and ARKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOLZ vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLZ drawdown since its inception was -75.68%, smaller than the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLZ and ARKW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOLZ	ARKW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.68%	-80.52%	+4.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.68%	-36.21%	-39.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-77.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.17%	-26.87%	-45.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.22%	-23.95%	-14.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.65%	19.23%	+34.42%

Volatility

SOLZ vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison

Solana ETF (SOLZ) has a higher volatility of 12.42% compared to ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) at 8.49%. This indicates that SOLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOLZ	ARKW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.42%	8.49%	+3.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.91%	25.82%	+25.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.12%	33.51%	+39.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.21%	43.76%	+31.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.21%	37.82%	+37.39%

SOLZ vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOLZ vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison

SOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than ARKW's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF	1.74%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	1.29%	0.00%	13.05%	2.05%	0.00%	2.29%
SOLZ Solana ETF	3.74%	1.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOLZ and ARKW in my portfolio?

SOLZ and ARKW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOLZ or ARKW?

SOLZ has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to ARKW (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLZ dropped -75.68% vs ARKW's -80.52%.

Which ETF is better, SOLZ or ARKW?

On 1-year performance, ARKW leads with -12.08% vs -62.81% for SOLZ. On fees, ARKW is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 8.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOLZ or ARKW?

Over the 1-year period, ARKW has performed better with a -12.08% return vs -62.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOLZ or ARKW?

ARKW is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SOLZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOLZ or ARKW?

SOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 1.74% for ARKW.

What is the main difference between SOLZ and ARKW?

SOLZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SOLZ and 0.76% for ARKW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARKW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.