PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOLX.TO vs. ARKD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOLX.TO vs. ARKD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Galaxy Solana ETF (SOLX.TO) and ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SOLX.TO is traded in CAD, while ARKD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARKD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


SOLX.TO

1D
-2.37%
1M
-9.51%
YTD
-39.87%
6M
-49.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARKD

1D
-1.03%
1M
1.53%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOLX.TO vs. ARKD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SOLX.TO and ARKD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOLX.TO vs. ARKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Galaxy Solana ETF (SOLX.TO) and ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOLX.TO vs. ARKD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOLX.TOARKDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.02

-0.11

-0.91

Drawdowns

SOLX.TO vs. ARKD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOLX.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.44%, which is greater than ARKD's maximum drawdown of -13.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLX.TO and ARKD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOLX.TOARKDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.44%

-13.72%

-56.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.44%

-4.35%

-66.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.74%

-7.17%

-40.57%

Volatility

SOLX.TO vs. ARKD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOLX.TOARKDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.25%

19.09%

+54.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.25%

19.09%

+54.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.25%

19.09%

+54.16%

SOLX.TO vs. ARKD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOLX.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKD's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOLX.TO vs. ARKD - Dividend Comparison

Neither SOLX.TO nor ARKD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SOLX.TO and ARKD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARKD is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARKD is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SOLX.TO.

They also come from different issuers: CI and ARK. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SOLX.TO and 0.90% for ARKD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOLX.TO and ARKD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer