SOLQ.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO
SOLQ.TO (3iQ Solana Staking ETF) and BTCC-B.TO (Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOLQ.TO returned -49.19% vs -43.66% for BTCC-B.TO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
SOLQ.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLQ.TO achieves a -35.22% return, which is significantly lower than BTCC-B.TO's -24.45% return.
SOLQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- 6M
- -46.18%
- YTD
- -35.22%
- 1Y
- -49.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC-B.TO
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -33.12%
- YTD
- -24.45%
- 1Y
- -43.66%
- 3Y*
- 30.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- —
SOLQ.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLQ.TO 3iQ Solana Staking ETF | -35.22% | -1.38% |
BTCC-B.TO Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units | -24.45% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLQ.TO and BTCC-B.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SOLQ.TO and BTCC-B.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLQ.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SOLQ.TO
BTCC-B.TO
SOLQ.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3iQ Solana Staking ETF (SOLQ.TO) and Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOLQ.TO | BTCC-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.83 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.83 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | -1.30 | +0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOLQ.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.59%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCC-B.TO drawdown of -75.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLQ.TO and BTCC-B.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLQ.TO | BTCC-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.59% | -75.12% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.59% | -52.89% | -20.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.55% | -48.39% | -19.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.30% | -33.15% | -4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.13% | 33.70% | +16.43% |
Volatility
SOLQ.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
3iQ Solana Staking ETF (SOLQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.13% compared to Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) at 9.62%. This indicates that SOLQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCC-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLQ.TO | BTCC-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.13% | 9.62% | +9.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.32% | 33.33% | +17.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.16% | 43.18% | +29.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.18% | 52.94% | +18.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.18% | 54.68% | +16.50% |
Dividends
SOLQ.TO vs. BTCC-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SOLQ.TO nor BTCC-B.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLQ.TO and BTCC-B.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: 3iQ and Purpose Investments.
Find the right allocation for SOLQ.TO and BTCC-B.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer