SOL-USD vs. PPFB.DE

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SOL-USD (Solana) is a cryptocurrency, while PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the Gold. Over the past 3 years, SOL-USD returned 68.07%/yr vs 31.53%/yr for PPFB.DE. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SOL-USD vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solana (SOL-USD) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SOL-USD is traded in USD, while PPFB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PPFB.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOL-USD achieves a -44.76% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's 1.54% return.

SOL-USD

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -25.39%
• YTD: -44.76%
• 6M: -48.38%
• 1Y: -53.76%
• 3Y*: 68.07%
• 5Y*: 12.17%
• 10Y*: —

PPFB.DE

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.62%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 4.30%
• 1Y: 30.61%
• 3Y*: 31.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOL-USD vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SOL-USD Solana	-44.76%	-34.09%	85.68%	919.96%	-94.13%	494.11%
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC	1.54%	68.33%	26.50%	12.88%	1.14%	-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SOL-USD and PPFB.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021	0.08

Return for Risk

SOL-USD vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOL-USD

SOL-USD Risk / Return Rank: 51
SOL-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SOL-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SOL-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SOL-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SOL-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 51

PPFB.DE

PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 36
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOL-USD vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solana (SOL-USD) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOL-USD	PPFB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	1.33	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.98	1.77	-2.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.25	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	1.87	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	4.78	-5.94

SOL-USD vs. PPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOL-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOL-USD and PPFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOL-USD vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOL-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.27%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOL-USD and PPFB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOL-USD	PPFB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.27%	-21.42%	-74.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.89%	-17.21%	-57.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-76.28%	-17.21%	-59.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.76%	-15.63%	-58.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.42%	-5.42%	-46.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.06%	6.76%	+46.30%

Volatility

SOL-USD vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Solana (SOL-USD) has a higher volatility of 17.62% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 5.67%. This indicates that SOL-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOL-USD	PPFB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.62%	5.67%	+11.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.90%	21.08%	+25.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.08%	24.30%	+35.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.35%	17.39%	+64.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	99.82%	17.39%	+82.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOL-USD and PPFB.DE in my portfolio?

SOL-USD and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.