PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNSG.L vs. INTL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNSG.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Internet of Things UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SNSG.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SNSG.L is traded in GBP, while INTL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INTL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNSG.L achieves a 43.59% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 49.02% return.


SNSG.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
17.84%
YTD
43.59%
6M
40.40%
1Y
49.16%
3Y*
15.17%
5Y*
10Y*

INTL.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
19.68%
YTD
49.02%
6M
48.14%
1Y
93.22%
3Y*
30.82%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNSG.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SNSG.L
Global X Internet of Things UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
43.59%-0.58%0.84%16.82%-16.52%-2.35%
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc
49.02%14.50%13.58%48.71%-35.12%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SNSG.L and INTL.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021

0.85

The correlation between SNSG.L and INTL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNSG.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNSG.L
SNSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SNSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SNSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNSG.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SNSG.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNSG.LINTL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.56

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

6.14

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

18.98

-8.67

SNSG.L vs. INTL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNSG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is lower than the INTL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNSG.L and INTL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNSG.LINTL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

3.71

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.94

-0.61

Drawdowns

SNSG.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.09%, smaller than the maximum INTL.L drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSG.L and INTL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNSG.LINTL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.09%

-37.71%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.71%

-15.10%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.12%

-33.54%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.88%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-10.99%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

4.90%

-0.14%

Volatility

SNSG.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Internet of Things UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SNSG.L) is 8.29%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that SNSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNSG.LINTL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

9.37%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.93%

18.48%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.76%

24.97%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.80%

25.61%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

26.28%

-4.48%

SNSG.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSG.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNSG.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNSG.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SNSG.L and INTL.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INTL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INTL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SNSG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SNSG.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNSG.L and INTL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer