SNPE vs. CPSU
SNPE (Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF) and CPSU (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while CPSU is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. SNPE is passively managed, while CPSU is actively managed. Over the past year, SNPE returned 32.05% vs 6.60% for CPSU. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNPE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSU.
Performance
SNPE vs. CPSU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNPE achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than CPSU's 2.35% return.
SNPE
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 32.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- —
CPSU
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNPE vs. CPSU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 10.55% | 19.45% |
CPSU Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June | 2.35% | 4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNPE and CPSU is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNPE vs. CPSU — Risk / Return Rank
SNPE
CPSU
SNPE vs. CPSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNPE | CPSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.68 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.73 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNPE | CPSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 3.85 | -2.97 |
Drawdowns
SNPE vs. CPSU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNPE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than CPSU's maximum drawdown of -1.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPE and CPSU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNPE | CPSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -1.03% | -32.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -1.03% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.10% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -0.07% | -4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | — | — |
Volatility
SNPE vs. CPSU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNPE | CPSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.01% | 1.72% | +10.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 1.72% | +15.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 1.72% | +17.95% |
SNPE vs. CPSU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNPE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSU's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNPE vs. CPSU - Dividend Comparison
SNPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while CPSU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPSU Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.91% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.32% | 1.65% | 1.08% | 1.42% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNPE and CPSU have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, SNPE leads with 32.05% vs 6.60% for CPSU. On fees, SNPE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SNPE has performed better with a 32.05% return vs 6.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SNPE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSU.
SNPE has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for CPSU.
SNPE is categorized as S&P 500, while CPSU is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SNPE and 0.69% for CPSU.
Find the right allocation for SNPE and CPSU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer