PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPE vs. CPSU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNPE vs. CPSU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPE achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than CPSU's 2.35% return.


SNPE

1D
-0.43%
1M
4.92%
YTD
10.55%
6M
11.45%
1Y
32.05%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*

CPSU

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.35%
6M
2.95%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPE vs. CPSU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SNPE and CPSU is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNPE vs. CPSU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPE
SNPE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SNPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSU
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPE vs. CPSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNPECPSUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.08

SNPE vs. CPSU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNPECPSUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

3.85

-2.97

Drawdowns

SNPE vs. CPSU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than CPSU's maximum drawdown of -1.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPE and CPSU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPECPSUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-1.03%

-32.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-1.03%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.10%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-0.07%

-4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

Volatility

SNPE vs. CPSU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNPECPSUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

1.72%

+10.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

1.72%

+15.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

1.72%

+17.95%

SNPE vs. CPSU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSU's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNPE vs. CPSU - Dividend Comparison

SNPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while CPSU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CPSU
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SNPE
Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF
0.91%1.01%1.17%1.32%1.65%1.08%1.42%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNPE and CPSU have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, SNPE leads with 32.05% vs 6.60% for CPSU. On fees, SNPE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SNPE has performed better with a 32.05% return vs 6.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSU.

SNPE has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for CPSU.

SNPE is categorized as S&P 500, while CPSU is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SNPE and 0.69% for CPSU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNPE and CPSU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer