SNOW vs. XONE
SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) is a stock, while XONE (BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Target Duration Index. Over the past 3 years, SNOW returned 11.26%/yr vs 4.57%/yr for XONE. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SNOW vs. XONE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOW achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly higher than XONE's 1.11% return.
SNOW
- 1D
- -7.61%
- 1M
- 67.31%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
XONE
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNOW vs. XONE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 9.99% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -26.95% |
XONE BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 1.11% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 4.74% | 0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOW and XONE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOW vs. XONE — Risk / Return Rank
SNOW
XONE
SNOW vs. XONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNOW | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -16.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 3.57 | -2.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 24.16 | -23.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.60 | 138.74 | -138.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNOW | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 7.06 | -6.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 4.96 | -4.97 |
Drawdowns
SNOW vs. XONE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOW drawdown since its inception was -72.99%, which is greater than XONE's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOW and XONE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOW | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.99% | -0.40% | -72.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.30% | -0.16% | -56.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.30% | -0.28% | -56.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.96% | -0.02% | -39.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.10% | -0.04% | -49.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.82% | 0.03% | +25.79% |
Volatility
SNOW vs. XONE - Volatility Comparison
Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a higher volatility of 36.32% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) at 0.10%. This indicates that SNOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOW | XONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.32% | 0.10% | +36.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.14% | 0.34% | +53.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.21% | 0.55% | +64.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.92% | 0.86% | +61.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.81% | 0.86% | +61.95% |
Dividends
SNOW vs. XONE - Dividend Comparison
SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XONE BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.06% | 4.33% | 5.21% | 4.46% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOW and XONE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOW has higher volatility (36.32%) compared to XONE (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOW dropped -72.99% vs XONE's -0.40%.
XONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOW and XONE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer