SNOW vs. ECO
SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) and ECO (Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp) are both stocks. SNOW operates in Software - Application (Technology), while ECO operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past year, SNOW returned 24.00% vs 156.80% for ECO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNOW vs. ECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOW achieves a 19.19% return, which is significantly lower than ECO's 73.56% return.
SNOW
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 19.33%
- YTD
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- —
ECO
- 1D
- 5.19%
- 1M
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 54.36%
- YTD
- 73.56%
- 1Y
- 156.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNOW vs. ECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 19.19% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 6.24% |
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 73.56% | 71.94% | -11.70% | -1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOW and ECO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
SNOW:
$90.62B
ECO:
$1.80B
SNOW:
-$3.53
ECO:
$5.73
SNOW:
17.63
ECO:
3.96
SNOW:
43.82
ECO:
2.89
SNOW:
$5.03B
ECO:
$481.57M
SNOW:
$3.38B
ECO:
$274.61M
SNOW:
-$1.21B
ECO:
$284.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOW vs. ECO — Risk / Return Rank
SNOW
ECO
SNOW vs. ECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNOW | ECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.50 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 9.25 | -8.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 25.78 | -24.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNOW vs. ECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOW drawdown since its inception was -72.99%, which is greater than ECO's maximum drawdown of -46.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOW and ECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOW | ECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.99% | -46.15% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.30% | -17.66% | -38.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.94% | -3.00% | -31.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -14.89% | -34.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.10% | 6.33% | +19.77% |
Volatility
SNOW vs. ECO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) is 12.19%, while Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) has a volatility of 15.55%. This indicates that SNOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOW | ECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.19% | 15.55% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.30% | 31.07% | +22.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.06% | 41.32% | +24.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.97% | 42.27% | +19.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.49% | 42.27% | +20.22% |
Dividends
SNOW vs. ECO - Dividend Comparison
SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 9.10% | 6.26% | 15.57% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SNOW vs. ECO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snowflake Inc. and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SNOW vs. ECO - Profitability Comparison
SNOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.
ECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.
SNOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.
ECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.
SNOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.
ECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOW and ECO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECO has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to SNOW (12.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOW dropped -72.99% vs ECO's -46.15%.
ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOW and ECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer