SNOW vs. CORN
SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) is a stock, while CORN (Teucrium Corn Fund) is Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark. Over the past 5 years, SNOW returned -0.60%/yr vs -1.79%/yr for CORN. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SNOW vs. CORN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOW achieves a 19.19% return, which is significantly higher than CORN's -1.41% return.
SNOW
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 19.33%
- YTD
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CORN
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 1.22%
- 3Y*
- -8.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.79%
- 10Y*
- -1.25%
SNOW vs. CORN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 19.19% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 20.38% | 14.86% |
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund | -1.41% | -5.54% | -12.98% | -19.90% | 25.02% | 38.25% | 21.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOW and CORN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.02 |
The correlation between SNOW and CORN shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (5 years) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOW vs. CORN — Risk / Return Rank
SNOW
CORN
SNOW vs. CORN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SNOW | CORN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.02 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.04 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 0.11 | +0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNOW vs. CORN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOW drawdown since its inception was -72.99%, smaller than the maximum CORN drawdown of -78.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOW and CORN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOW | CORN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.99% | -78.09% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.30% | -13.86% | -42.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.30% | -34.56% | -21.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.99% | -45.19% | -27.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.94% | -66.81% | +31.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -51.17% | +2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.10% | 4.67% | +21.43% |
Volatility
SNOW vs. CORN - Volatility Comparison
Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a higher volatility of 12.19% compared to Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) at 6.58%. This indicates that SNOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CORN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOW | CORN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.19% | 6.58% | +5.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.30% | 12.85% | +40.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.06% | 15.60% | +50.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.97% | 19.31% | +42.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.49% | 19.31% | +43.18% |
Dividends
SNOW vs. CORN - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNOW nor CORN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOW and CORN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOW has higher volatility (12.19%) compared to CORN (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOW dropped -72.99% vs CORN's -78.09%.
SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOW and CORN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer