PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNOU vs. DOGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNOU vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNOU achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 8.91% return.


SNOU

1D
-5.04%
1M
15.21%
6M
3.96%
YTD
2.83%
1Y
-5.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DOGG

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.25%
6M
8.28%
YTD
8.91%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNOU vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SNOU and DOGG is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNOU vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOU
SNOU Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SNOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNOU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SNOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNOU Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DOGG
DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNOU vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNOUDOGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.27

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

2.08

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.18

4.48

-4.66

SNOU vs. DOGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNOU Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the DOGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNOU and DOGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNOU vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNOU drawdown since its inception was -84.17%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOU and DOGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNOUDOGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.17%

-11.19%

-72.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.17%

-8.29%

-75.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.38%

-4.27%

-35.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-3.27%

-30.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.27%

3.86%

+43.41%

Volatility

SNOU vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF (SNOU) has a higher volatility of 24.68% compared to FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) at 4.17%. This indicates that SNOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNOUDOGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.68%

4.17%

+20.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

104.33%

8.77%

+95.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

133.42%

11.01%

+122.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

126.05%

12.99%

+113.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.05%

12.99%

+113.06%

SNOU vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNOU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNOU vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison

SNOU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, less than DOGG's 8.69% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.69%8.75%9.92%5.89%
SNOU
T-Rex 2X Long SNOW Daily Target ETF
5.81%5.97%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNOU and DOGG have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNOU has higher volatility (24.68%) compared to DOGG (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOU dropped -84.17% vs DOGG's -11.19%.

On 1-year performance, DOGG leads with 17.76% vs -5.59% for SNOU. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DOGG has performed better with a 17.76% return vs -5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNOU.

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.69%, compared with 5.81% for SNOU.

SNOU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DOGG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNOU and 0.75% for DOGG.

DOGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNOU and DOGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer