SNLN vs. BSJO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNLN (Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF) and BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SNLN tracks the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index while BSJO tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index. Both are passively managed. SNLN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJO.

Performance

SNLN vs. BSJO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF (SNLN) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SNLN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSJO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNLN vs. BSJO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SNLN Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF	0.00%
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

SNLN vs. BSJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF (SNLN) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SNLN	BSJO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	0.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNLN	BSJO	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	0.00%	—

SNLN vs. BSJO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNLN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJO's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNLN vs. BSJO - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNLN nor BSJO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNLN Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF	0.00%	5.50%	4.88%	2.83%	3.21%	4.72%	5.03%	4.75%	4.36%	4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, SNLN or BSJO?

On fees, BSJO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNLN or BSJO?

BSJO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SNLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNLN or BSJO?

SNLN and BSJO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SNLN and BSJO?

SNLN tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index, while BSJO tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Highland Capital Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SNLN and 0.42% for BSJO.