PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNGRX vs. GSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNGRX vs. GSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT International Growth Fund (SNGRX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNGRX achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than GSINX's 3.40% return.


SNGRX

1D
1.40%
1M
1.51%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.97%
1Y
21.88%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
8.28%

GSINX

1D
-0.90%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
3.40%
6M
4.23%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNGRX vs. GSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNGRX
SIT International Growth Fund
10.42%22.14%5.54%19.98%-22.07%11.87%18.63%26.17%-16.28%24.02%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
3.40%20.76%9.53%21.93%-11.14%12.35%15.64%27.41%-6.14%29.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SNGRX and GSINX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between SNGRX and GSINX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNGRX vs. GSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNGRX
SNGRX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SNGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SNGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GSINX
GSINX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNGRX vs. GSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT International Growth Fund (SNGRX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNGRXGSINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.28

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

3.97

+3.95

SNGRX vs. GSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the GSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNGRX and GSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNGRX vs. GSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNGRX drawdown since its inception was -72.79%, which is greater than GSINX's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNGRX and GSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNGRXGSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.79%

-28.80%

-43.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-7.80%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.16%

-10.32%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.11%

-25.46%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-6.43%

+4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.70%

-4.85%

-22.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.51%

+0.16%

Volatility

SNGRX vs. GSINX - Volatility Comparison

SIT International Growth Fund (SNGRX) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) at 2.79%. This indicates that SNGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNGRXGSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

2.79%

+3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

8.25%

+5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

9.90%

+5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

14.38%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

15.68%

+1.73%

SNGRX vs. GSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNGRX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GSINX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNGRX vs. GSINX - Dividend Comparison

SNGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than GSINX's 4.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.86%5.03%11.11%2.27%4.79%2.13%0.08%0.57%0.43%0.12%0.00%0.00%
SNGRX
SIT International Growth Fund
1.00%1.10%3.53%2.07%2.00%0.23%0.22%0.94%1.25%0.83%0.50%7.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNGRX and GSINX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNGRX has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to GSINX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNGRX dropped -72.79% vs GSINX's -28.80%.

SNGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNGRX and GSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer