PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNEX vs. IBKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNEX vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNEX achieves a 118.84% return, which is significantly higher than IBKR's 50.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SNEX has outperformed IBKR with an annualized return of 33.48%, while IBKR has yielded a comparatively lower 27.83% annualized return.


SNEX

1D
-0.16%
1M
23.79%
YTD
118.84%
6M
115.47%
1Y
145.88%
3Y*
77.18%
5Y*
49.24%
10Y*
33.48%

IBKR

1D
0.85%
1M
19.14%
YTD
50.87%
6M
47.46%
1Y
89.45%
3Y*
70.06%
5Y*
43.64%
10Y*
27.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNEX vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNEX
StoneX Group Inc.
118.84%45.65%32.70%16.21%55.59%5.79%18.57%33.49%-13.99%7.40%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
50.87%46.37%114.43%15.14%-8.35%31.12%31.71%-14.01%-7.13%63.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SNEX and IBKR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNEX:

$11.31B

IBKR:

$43.41B

EPS

SNEX:

$7.78

IBKR:

$3.76

PE Ratio

SNEX:

17.83

IBKR:

25.78

PEG Ratio

SNEX:

0.67

IBKR:

0.88

PS Ratio

SNEX:

0.05

IBKR:

4.97

PB Ratio

SNEX:

4.19

IBKR:

2.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNEX:

$152.34B

IBKR:

$8.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNEX:

$47.64B

IBKR:

$7.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNEX:

$2.46B

IBKR:

$7.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNEX vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNEX
SNEX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SNEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SNEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IBKR
IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNEX vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNEXIBKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.37

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.02

4.81

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.98

12.23

+5.75

SNEX vs. IBKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the IBKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNEX and IBKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNEX vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNEX drawdown since its inception was -97.89%, which is greater than IBKR's maximum drawdown of -63.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNEX and IBKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNEXIBKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.89%

-63.66%

-34.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.91%

-18.70%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-38.66%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-38.66%

+14.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.65%

-55.09%

+6.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.86%

-24.82%

-18.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.15%

7.34%

+0.81%

Volatility

SNEX vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison

StoneX Group Inc. (SNEX) has a higher volatility of 12.39% compared to Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) at 10.14%. This indicates that SNEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNEXIBKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.39%

10.14%

+2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.98%

27.61%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.87%

37.54%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.24%

34.51%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.55%

33.37%

+3.18%

Dividends

SNEX vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison

SNEX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.34%0.47%0.48%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.66%0.86%0.73%0.68%1.10%0.92%
SNEX
StoneX Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SNEX vs. IBKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between StoneX Group Inc. and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
45.76B
765.00M
(SNEX) Total Revenue
(IBKR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SNEX and IBKR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNEX has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to IBKR (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNEX dropped -97.89% vs IBKR's -63.66%.

SNEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNEX and IBKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer