PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAZ.DE vs. SEAD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNAZ.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (SEAD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAZ.DE achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than SEAD.DE's 1.42% return.


SNAZ.DE

1D
0.39%
1M
0.39%
6M
0.98%
YTD
0.98%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*

SEAD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.11%
6M
1.42%
YTD
1.42%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAZ.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SNAZ.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.98%6.26%4.36%5.28%-14.17%-1.55%5.52%
SEAD.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist
1.42%7.68%5.50%5.69%-12.29%-0.78%1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAZ.DE and SEAD.DE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2020

0.58

The correlation between SNAZ.DE and SEAD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAZ.DE vs. SEAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAZ.DE
SNAZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SNAZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SEAD.DE
SEAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SEAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SEAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAZ.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (SEAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNAZ.DESEAD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

2.42

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.14

9.89

-4.75

SNAZ.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the SEAD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAZ.DE and SEAD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNAZ.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, which is greater than SEAD.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAZ.DE and SEAD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAZ.DESEAD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-17.98%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-2.08%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

-2.40%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-17.98%

-3.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.40%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-5.65%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.51%

+0.28%

Volatility

SNAZ.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (SEAD.DE) at 0.59%. This indicates that SNAZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEAD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAZ.DESEAD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.59%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

2.36%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

2.85%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.06%

4.30%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.65%

4.81%

+2.84%

SNAZ.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAZ.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SEAD.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNAZ.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Dividend Comparison

SNAZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEAD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SEAD.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist
6.88%4.97%6.21%4.80%4.53%4.02%2.40%
SNAZ.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNAZ.DE and SEAD.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SEAD.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEAD.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SNAZ.DE.

SNAZ.DE tracks J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index (EUR Hedged), while SEAD.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Diversified 3% capped 1-5 (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SNAZ.DE and 0.38% for SEAD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAZ.DE and SEAD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer