PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAZ.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNAZ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAZ.DE achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.40% return.


SNAZ.DE

1D
0.39%
1M
0.39%
6M
0.98%
YTD
0.98%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*

EUNA.DE

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.41%
6M
0.20%
YTD
-0.40%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
2.34%
5Y*
-1.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAZ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SNAZ.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.98%6.26%4.36%5.28%-14.17%-1.55%5.52%
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.40%2.91%1.48%4.41%-13.52%-2.42%0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAZ.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2020

0.49

The correlation between SNAZ.DE and EUNA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAZ.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAZ.DE
SNAZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SNAZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAZ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNAZ.DEEUNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.04

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

0.29

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.14

0.78

+4.36

SNAZ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAZ.DE and EUNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNAZ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAZ.DE and EUNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAZ.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-17.81%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-2.80%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

-4.11%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-17.04%

-4.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-8.53%

+7.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-6.71%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

1.05%

-0.26%

Volatility

SNAZ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SNAZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 0.86%. This indicates that SNAZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAZ.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.86%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

2.83%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

3.73%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.06%

4.84%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.65%

4.44%

+3.21%

SNAZ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAZ.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNAZ.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNAZ.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SNAZ.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SNAZ.DE.

SNAZ.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. SNAZ.DE tracks J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index (EUR Hedged), while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SNAZ.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAZ.DE and EUNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer