SNAW.DE vs. WRLD.DE
SNAW.DE (iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and WRLD.DE (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SNAW.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Screened while WRLD.DE tracks the Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNAW.DE returned 18.23%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for WRLD.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNAW.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for WRLD.DE.
Performance
SNAW.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAW.DE achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than WRLD.DE's 18.45% return.
SNAW.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 24.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
WRLD.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 18.45%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNAW.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAW.DE iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.75% | 7.91% | 27.45% | 22.43% | -15.24% | 10.55% |
WRLD.DE Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 18.45% | 11.71% | 1.59% | 11.63% | -16.39% | 8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAW.DE and WRLD.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021 | 0.77 |
The correlation between SNAW.DE and WRLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAW.DE vs. WRLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SNAW.DE
WRLD.DE
SNAW.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) and Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNAW.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.34 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 3.57 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.49 | 11.33 | +1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAW.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.91 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.38 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
SNAW.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, which is greater than WRLD.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAW.DE and WRLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAW.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | -23.55% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -7.90% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.37% | -19.51% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.38% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -9.51% | +4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.50% | -0.55% |
Volatility
SNAW.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) is 2.85%, while Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (WRLD.DE) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that SNAW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAW.DE | WRLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 4.50% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 11.34% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 14.81% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 16.98% | -2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 16.98% | +0.18% |
SNAW.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WRLD.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAW.DE vs. WRLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAW.DE nor WRLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAW.DE and WRLD.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNAW.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAW.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WRLD.DE.
SNAW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Screened, while WRLD.DE tracks Foxberry SMS Environmental Impact 100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SNAW.DE and 0.55% for WRLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for SNAW.DE and WRLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer