SNAW.DE vs. SPP2.DE
SNAW.DE (iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SPP2.DE (SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) are both Global Equities funds - SNAW.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Screened while SPP2.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI (USD Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNAW.DE returned 13.25%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for SPP2.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNAW.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPP2.DE.
Performance
SNAW.DE vs. SPP2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SNAW.DE is traded in EUR, while SPP2.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPP2.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAW.DE achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than SPP2.DE's 13.03% return.
SNAW.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 24.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SPP2.DE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 6M
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- —
SNAW.DE vs. SPP2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAW.DE iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.75% | 7.91% | 27.45% | 22.43% | -15.24% | 33.21% | 7.69% |
SPP2.DE SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 13.04% | 7.39% | 27.67% | 19.17% | -11.61% | 31.66% | 6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAW.DE and SPP2.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SNAW.DE and SPP2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAW.DE vs. SPP2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SNAW.DE
SPP2.DE
SNAW.DE vs. SPP2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (SPP2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNAW.DE | SPP2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 4.68 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.49 | 16.59 | -4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAW.DE | SPP2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.19 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.92 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.08 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
SNAW.DE vs. SPP2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, which is greater than SPP2.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAW.DE and SPP2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAW.DE | SPP2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | -21.23% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -5.87% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.37% | -21.23% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.37% | -21.23% | -1.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.53% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -3.51% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.66% | +0.29% |
Volatility
SNAW.DE vs. SPP2.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) is 2.85%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (SPP2.DE) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that SNAW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPP2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAW.DE | SPP2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 3.27% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 9.26% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 12.55% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 14.69% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 14.56% | +2.60% |
SNAW.DE vs. SPP2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPP2.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAW.DE vs. SPP2.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAW.DE nor SPP2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SNAW.DE and SPP2.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SNAW.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAW.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPP2.DE.
SNAW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Screened, while SPP2.DE tracks MSCI ACWI (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SNAW.DE and 0.45% for SPP2.DE.
Find the right allocation for SNAW.DE and SPP2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer