SNAW.DE vs. F50A.DE
SNAW.DE (iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and F50A.DE (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - SNAW.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Screened while F50A.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNAW.DE returned 13.25%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for F50A.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNAW.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for F50A.DE.
Performance
SNAW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SNAW.DE having a 10.75% return and F50A.DE slightly higher at 10.81%.
SNAW.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 24.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
F50A.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
SNAW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAW.DE iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.75% | 7.91% | 27.45% | 22.43% | -15.24% | 33.21% | 0.73% |
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.81% | 8.58% | 25.85% | 19.91% | -13.61% | 32.73% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAW.DE and F50A.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SNAW.DE and F50A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAW.DE vs. F50A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SNAW.DE
F50A.DE
SNAW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNAW.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.40 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 3.66 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.49 | 14.61 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAW.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.17 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.88 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.71 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SNAW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, roughly equal to the maximum F50A.DE drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAW.DE and F50A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAW.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | -32.88% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -6.62% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.37% | -21.49% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.37% | -21.49% | -0.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.39% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -4.72% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.66% | +0.29% |
Volatility
SNAW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that SNAW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F50A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAW.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 2.63% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 7.95% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 11.18% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 14.60% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 17.70% | -0.54% |
SNAW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than F50A.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SNAW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNAW.DE nor F50A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SNAW.DE and F50A.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SNAW.DE.
SNAW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Screened, while F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SNAW.DE and 0.05% for F50A.DE.
Find the right allocation for SNAW.DE and F50A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer